Loading...
Res. No. 108-90-9134RESOLUTION NO.108-90-9134 A RESOLUTION OFTHE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,APPROVING A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF ^HE PENDING ACTIONS BY S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION,D/B/A CLUB MANHATTAN VS.CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA,AND AUTHORIZINGTHEADMINISTRATIONTOEXECUTETHEDOCUMENTS NECESSARY THEREFOR. WHEREAS,by Resolution No.101-QD-Q107?dated July 31,1QQQ the Mayor and City Commission revoked the occupational license of,and denied transfer of the occupational license to,S.K.S. Entertainment Corporation,d/h/a Club Manhattan;and WHEREAS,thereafter S.P1.S.Entertainment Corporation filed a suit for damages and other relief in Circuit Court of Dade County and filed an action for review in the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court of Dade County,and WHEREAS,S.K.S.Entertainment Corporation hasnowtendered to the City of South Miami a proposed settlement ofthe aforesaid pending actions;and WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Commission of the City o^South Miami,Florida,desire to accept the proposed settlement, NOW,THEREFORE,BFIT RESOLVED BYTHE MAYOR AMD CTTY COMMISSION OFTHECITYOFSOUTH MIAMI,FLORIDA: Section 1.The settlement proposedby S.FC.S.Entertainment Corporation be and the same is hereby accepted by the City of South Miami ;copyofwhich is attached hereto. ^Section 2.The Administration of the City of South Miami, Florida,is authorized to execute such documents as are necessary toeffectuatetheforegoing section. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of September j 1090. APPROVED: ATTEST: READ AND APPROVED AS T^FORM /4(M£c* CITY ATTOPNtv S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORP., a Florida corporation d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN, Plaintiff, vs. THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, amunicipalcorporation, Defendant. ./ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA CASE NO.90-38588 (32) STIPULATION FOR SETTLEMENT Plaintiff,S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN ("S.K.S.")and Defendant,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ("CITY"),by and through their respective counsel,file their Stipulation for Settlement and state the following: 1.In consideration for the CITY issuing an occupational license to S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORP.to operate CLUB MANHATTAN located at 6600 Red Road,South Miami,Florida,and the CITY'S withdrawal of Notices of Violation issued on August 24 and 25,1990, citing Plaintiff with operating a business without an occupational license,S.K.S.accepts same as full and final settlement of its cause ofactionfiledintheabovestyled action. 2.Plaintiff,S.K.S.,shall immediately file a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the above styled action representing S.K.S.'s last and final recourse in this matter and S.K.S.waives its rights,if any,to further judicial remedy,excepting the retention of this Court's jurisdiction toenforcethetermsand conditions ofthis Stipulation.Additionally,Plaintiff shall immediately file a voluntary dismissal with prejudice of the case styled S.K.S. Entertainment Corp.v.TheCityofSouthMiami.Case No.90-196-AP filedinthe Appellate Divisionofthe Circuit Courtofthe11th Judicial Circuit and tender to Defendant a general release executed by Plaintiff in favor of Defendant,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,its successors or assignees,elected officials,employees,agents and the Florida Municipal Liability Self-Insurer's Fund. 3.Inthe future operation ofCLUB MANHATTAN,Plaintiff, S.K.S.,shall: a.Employa minimum offour (4)armedand uniformed security guards ora minimum of four (4)armed,off-duty police officers,visible in Plaintiff's parking lot during all hours in which Plaintiff's business is open tothepublic. b.Plaintiff shallnot operate its business atCLUB MANHATTAN on September 9,1990,and September 16,1990. c.PlaintiffintheoperationofCLUBMANHATTANshallnot offer or promote any "theme night"on Sunday nights if Plaintiff operates its business or is open to the public on Sunday nights. d.Plaintiff shall undertake all steps necessary to enroll in and complete a course recognized by the State of Florida Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco and obtain a certificationdesignatingPlaintiffasa"responsiblevendor"pursuant -toFla.Stat.§561.701-561.706. 4.Plaintiff acknowledges and agrees to notify the appropriate police orlaw enforcement agency immediately upon obtainingknowledgethatcriminalactivityhastakenplaceinsideCLUB MANHATTANintheparkinglotcontrolledbyCLUBMANHATTANorstemming from the operation of CLUB MANHATTAN. 5.Plaintiff acknowledges andagrees that itisresponsiblefor controllingtheconductofitspatronslocatedinthestructureknown asCLUB MANHATTAN andthe parking lot adjacent to and controlled by S.K.S.d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN. 6.Plaintiff acknowledges and agrees that Defendant,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,isamunicipalcorporationvestedwith police powers enabling the CITY to enforce the laws of the State of Florida,Dade County andtheCITYOFSOUTH MIAMI.Consequently,Defendant,CITYOF SOUTH MIAMI,willcontinuetoexerciseitspolicepowerstoenforce theabovereferencedlawsagainst Plaintiff andtakethe appropriate legal means to rectify or enforce the laws against S.K.S.d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN should a violation of law exist. 7.Defendant,CITYOFSOUTH MIAMI,willtakenoaction against Plaintiff,S.K.S.,to revoke or deny issuance ofan occupational license,based onany conduct whichis alleged tohave occurred prior to September 7,1990. 8.Notwithstandingthepreceding paragraph,intheeventofa future violationoflawby Plaintiff,nothinginthis Stipulation is to be construed as a waiver of the rights of Defendant,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,tomakeany lawful useofanyallegedprior violations oflaw byPlaintiffregardlessofwhentheymayhaveoccurred,inanyfuture administrative,quasi-judicial,judicial or appellate proceeding. 9.The above referenced convenants,conditions and agreements shall remain in effect in perpetuity,unless modified bythe parties. 10.Time isof the essence asto each and every item in this Stipulation. 11.Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. FLYNN and TARKOFF Attorneys for Plaintiff 1414 Coral Way Miami,Florida 33145 TEL:(305)858-1414 BY: VINCENT J.FLYNN CONROY,SIMBERG &LEWIS,P.A. Attorneys for Defendant 2620 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood,Florida 33020 TEL:(305)940-4821 BY: HARRIET LEWIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA CASE NO.90-196-AP APPELLATE DIVISION S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORP., a Florida corporation d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN, Appellant, vs. THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, Appellee. / STIPULATION FOR SETTTrygM?NT Appellant,S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION d/b/aCLUB MANHATTAN ("S.K.S.")andAppellee,CITYOF SOUTH MIAMI ("CITY"),byand through theirrespective counsel,filetheirStipulationforSettlementand state the following: 1.In consideration for the CITY issuing an occupational license to S.K.S.ENTERTAINMENT CORP.to operate CLUB MANHATTAN located at 6600 Red Road,South Miami,Florida,and the CITY'S withdrawal of Notices of Violation issued on August 24 and 25,1990, citing Appellantwith operating abusinesswithoutan occupational license,S.K.S.acceptssameasfullandfinal settlement ofitscause of action filed in the above styled action. 2.Appellant,S.K.S.,shall immediately fileavoluntary dismissalwith prejudice oftheabove styled action representing S.K.S.'s last and final recourse in this matter and S.K.S.waives its rights,if any,tofurther judicial remedy,exceptingthe retention of thisCourt'sjurisdictiontoenforcethetermsandconditionsofthis Stipulation.Additionally,Appellantshallimmediatelyfilea voluntary dismissalwithprejudiceofthecasestyled S.K.S. Entertainment Corp.v.TheCityofSouthMiami.Case No.90-38588 (32) filed in the General Jurisdiction Division of the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit and tender to Appellee a general release executed byAppellantinfavorof Appellee,CITYOFSOUTH MIAMI,its successorsorassignees,elected officials,employees,agentsandthe FloridaMunicipal Liability Self-Insurer's Fund. 3.In the future operation of CLUB MANHATTAN,Appellant, S.K.S.,shall: a.Employ aminimumof four (4)armedand uniformed security guards ora minimum of four (4)armed,off-duty police officers,visible in Appellant's parking lotduringall hours inwhich Appellant's business is open to the public. b.Appellant shall not operate its business at CLUB MANHATTANon September 9,1990,and September 16,1990. c.Appellantinthe operation ofCLUB MANHATTAN shall not offer or promote any "theme night"on Sunday nights if Appellant operates its business or is open to the public on Sunday nights. d.Appellantshallundertakeallstepsnecessaryto enroll inand complete a course recognized bythe State of Florida Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco and obtain a certificationdesignatingAppellantasa "responsible vendor"pursuant to Fla.Stat.§561.701-561.706. 4.Appellant acknowledgesandagreestonotifythe appropriate police or law enforcement agency immediately upon obtaining knowledge that criminal activity hastaken place inside CLUB MANHATTAN/in the parking lot controlled by CLUB MANHATTAN or stemming fromthe operation of CLUB MANHATTAN. 5.Appellant acknowledges and agrees that itis responsible for controlling the conduct.of its patrons leea^ed in the structure known asCLUB MANHATTAN andthe parking lot adjacent toand controlled by S.K.S.d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN. 6.Appellant acknowledges and agrees that Appellee,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,isa municipal corporation vested with police powers enabling the CITY to enforce the laws of the State of Florida,Dade County and the CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI.Consequently,Appellee,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,will continue to exercise its police powers to enforce the above referencedlawsagainstAppellantandtakethe appropriate legal means to rectify or enforce the laws against S.K.S.d/b/a CLUB MANHATTAN should a violation oflawexist. 7.Appellee,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,will take no action against Appellant,S.K.S.,to revoke or deny issuance of an occupational license,based on any conduct which is alleged to have occurred prior to September 7,1990. 8.Notwithstanding thepreceding paragraph,intheeventofa future violation oflawby Appellant,nothinginthis Stipulation is tobe construed asa waiver of the rights of Appellee,CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI,to make any lawful useof any alleged prior violations of law byAppellantregardlessofwhentheymayhaveoccurred,inanyfuture administrative,quasi-judicial,judicialor appellate proceeding. 9.The above referenced convenants,conditions and agreements shall remain in effect in perpetuity,unless modified bytheparties. 10.Time isof the essence as to each and every item in this Stipulation. 11.Each partyshall bear their own costs and attorney's fees. FLYNN and TARKOFF Attorneys for Appellant 1414 Coral Way Miami,Florida 33145 TEL:(305)858-1414 BY: VINCENT J.FLYNN CONROY,SIMBERG &LEWIS,P.A. Attorneys for Appellee 2620 Hollywood Boulevard Hollywood,Florida 33020 TEL:(305)940-4821 BY: HARRIET LEWIS