Loading...
Res. No. 139-07-12524RESOLUTION NO. 13 9-07-12524 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO A WAIVER OF THE SECOND STORY CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITION IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO -STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 7631 SW 59 AVENUE WITHIN AN RS -3 "LOW- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT," BASED UPON A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Administration and the City Commission are concerned that the construction of larger structures ( "MeMansions ") within established neighborhoods, adjacent to long standing smaller single family residences, is contrary to the established "character" of the neighborhoods in which they are located; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission, staff and various citizen Boards have initiated a comprehensive review of the existing regulations; and, WHEREAS, in conjunction with the review it is also appropriate to provide temporary limitations, restrictions and prohibitions in regard to the issuance of building permits for the activities under study, due to the potential detrimental impact upon the existing neighborhoods of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission at its February 6, 2007 meeting adopted Ordinance No. 03 -07 -1904 which established Interim Regulations for construction of two -story single family residential structures for a period of three months which legislation expired on May 5, 2007; and WHEREAS, the City Commission at its June 5, 2007 meeting adopted Ordinance No. 19 -07- 1920, which continued the Interim Regulations for a period of three months which legislation expires on September 5, 2007; and WHEREAS, an application was filed for the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) on March 23, 2007 requesting approval for the construction of a two -story residence located at 7631 SW 59 Avenue; and WHEREAS, the ERPB at its July 17, 2007 meeting recommended final approval for the construction of the subject two -story residence; and WHEREAS, the applicant desires to proceed immediately with the approved construction and has submitted an application to have the City Commission waive the second story construction prohibition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That the City Commission hereby approves a waiver of the second story construction prohibition for a new residence located at 7631 SW 59 Avenue. This determination is based upon a finding that the proposed development complies with the following provisions set forth in Section 3 (A) of Ordinance No. 19 -07 -1920: Pg. 2 of Res. No. 139 -07 -12524 (a) the interim regulation imposes undue hardship on the applicant; or (b) the development proposed by the applicant will not: (i) result in a material diminution of the privacy of adjoining residential properties; and (ii) will not result in an obvious departure from the aesthetic character of the immediate vicinity taking into account existing structures and open space; and (iii) the proposed structure will have no more than a de minimus impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjoining parcel,- or (c) the applicant is proposing to mitigate the effect of the redevelopment by providing adequate safeguards which the Commission finds would adequately mitigate any detrimental impact to the neighborhood. Section 2. The above approval of the waiver of the second story construction prohibition for a new residence located at 7631 SW 59 Avenue is conditioned upon the following: (1) If the existing trees that are to be relocated on the subject property do not survive, new trees shall be planted at „a minimum of eighteen feet in height; and, (2) Architect to revise plans depicting a thirty percent maximum impervious coverage_ Section 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon being approved. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,r+,,,r, ,1, 2007. ATTEST: Y CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0 Mayor Feliu: Yea Vice Mayor Wiscombe Yea Commissioner Palmer: Yea Commissioner Birts: Yea Commissioner Beckman: Yea KAComm ltems1200718- 7 -071To Waive Second Story Prohibition -7531 SW 59 Ave Resoltrtion.doc. South Miami Ail -A tterica City 1 f ,NCB CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM ao °' To: The Honorable Mayor Feliu and Members of the City Commission Via: Yvonne S. McKinley, City Manager From: Julian Perez, Planning Direc Date: August 7, 2007 ITEM No. 14 Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA RELATING TO A WAIVER OF THE SECOND STORY CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITION IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO -STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 7631 SW 59 AVENUE WITHIN AN RS -3 "LOW- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT," BASED UPON A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. APPLICANT'S REOUEST: The applicant, Mr. Robert Rivero submitted to the Planning Department an Environmental Review and Preservation Board Application (ERPB No. 07 -019), requesting approval for the new two -story residence. The subject property is specifically located at 7631 SW 59 Avenue, within the RS -3 "Low- Density Residential Zoning District." The approval process requires review by the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) and a public hearing by the City Commission as required by City Ordinance No. 19 -07 -1920. The City Commission may waive the second story construction prohibition if the proposed project, including site plan and specifications was approved by the ERPB and meets the requirements in Ordinance No. 19 -07- 1920. ERPB ACTION: On July 17, 2007, the ERPB recommended final approval of a two -story residence with conditions. A copy of the ERPB's staff report and ERPB's excerpt minutes with approved conditions are provided as part of this document. This project was presented to the ERPB for preliminary and final review. Landscaping comments were provided by the ERPB members during preliminary review to enhance the building design. These comments were incorporated in the final design plans submitted to the ERPB for final review and approval. The Board members complimented the architect for the building design and the ability to incorporate the design into the local environment. The Board recommended approval by a vote of 5 ayes 0 nays. Attached are a set of final architectural plans submitted by the applicant. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Commission review this project for consistency with Ordinance No. 19 -07 -1920, and whether a waiver of the prohibition should be granted. This determination is based upon finding that the proposed development complies with the following provisions set forth in Section 3(A) in Ordinance No. 19 -07 -1920 to determine wbetber a waiver of the prohibition should be granted are provided below: (a) the interim regulation imposes undue hardship on the applicant; or (b) the development proposed by the applicant will not: (i) result in a material diminution of the privacy of adjoining residential properties; and (ii) will not result in an obvious departure from the aesthetic character of the immediate vicinity taking into account existing structures and open space; and (iii) the proposed structure will have no more than a de minimus impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjoining parcel; or (c) the applicant is proposing to mitigate the effect of the redevelopment by providing adequate safeguards which the Commission finds would adequately mitigate any detrimental impact to the neighborhood. BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: + Draft Resolution • City Ordinance No. 19 -07 -1920 • ERPB Report, dated July 17, 2007 (ERPB No. 07 -019) • ERPB Excerpt minutes, dated July 17, 2007 • ERPB Excerpt minutes, dated April 3, 2007 • ERP13 Application, dated March 23, 2007 • Application to Waive Second Story Construction Prohibition, dated March 13, 2007 • LDC Section 20 -3.1 and Section 20 -3.5E • Application for Tree Removal, March 8, 20071 • 'Tree Removal Permit Conditions, March 9, 2007 • Addendum to "free Removal Permit, dated March 12, 2007 • Performance Bond Calculation Sheet, dated March 20, 2007 o Performance Bond Transferal Letter, dated March 23, 2007 • Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, dated March 21, 2007 • Property Survey (sheet size 24 "06 ") • Aerial View of Property • Neighborhood Pictures: Two -story • Architectural plans prepared by Cesar Molina & Associates: • Index of Drawings • Perspective Rendering of Front • Perspective Rendering of Back • Photographs: Subject and Abutting Properties, sht. G1.0 • General Notes, sht. G1.1 • Storm Water Retaining Plan, sht. C -I • Landscaping plan, sht. L -I • Planting Details, sht. L -2 • Irrigation Plan, sht. IR -1 and IR -2 • Site plan, sht. AI.0 • First Floor plan, sht. A2.0 • Second Floor plan, sht. A2.1 • Partial First Floor plan, sht A2.2 -A2.5 • Second Floor plan, sht A2.6 • First Floor General Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.0 • Second Floor Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.1 • Partial Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.2 -A3.5 • Second Floor Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht. A3.6 • Roof plan, sht. A4.0 • Elevations, sht. A5.0 -A5.1 • Building Sections, sht. A6.0 -A6.1 • Wall Section, sht. A7.0 -A7.6 • Column Detail, sht. A8.0 -A8.OA • Window Sill Detail, sht. A8.1 • Eave Detail, sht. A8.2, A8.2A, A8.3 and A8.4 • Details, sht A8.5 • Windows and Doors Schedule, sht. A10.© -A10.1 Perspective Rendering of Front (24 "x36" Presentation Board to be presented) = Perspective Rendering of Back (24 "x36" Presentation Board to be presented) = Photographs of Subject and Adjacent Properties ( 24 "x36 Presentation Board to be presented) Public Notices JP /SAY /LCH P:1Comm ltems1200718- 7- 071Waive Two Story 7631 SW 59 Ave CM Report Final 8- 07- 07.doc ORDINANCE NO. 19 -07 -1920 A ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH M LkNH, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; AUTHORIZING ' THE COMPLETION OF A STUDY RELATING TO "MC MANSIONS "; STAYING ALL RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF TWO - STORY HOMES FOR A THREE MONTH PERIOD TO COMPLETE. THE STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF THE SITUATION; PROVIDING FOR A WAIVER OF THE CONSTRUCTION STAY AFTER REVIEW BY ERPB AND CITY COMMISSION; PROVIDING CRITERIA FOR . WAIVER PROCESS; AND EXPANDING THE POWERS OF THE ERPB BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 20- 6.1(C)(3)(1); PROVIDING SEVERABILITY ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT, AND AN; EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, there has been much discussion and debate over the past number of months regarding the construction of new single family residential structures and additions to existing single family residential structures that appear to be too large for the building sites they occupy; and WHEREAS, it is believed that the aforesaid new construction and improvements to existing single family residences are only'the beginning of a trend that could increase as the older single family residences in the City are sold for demolition or reconstruction; and WHEREAS, the City Administration and the City Commission are concerned that the construction of these larger structures ( "MeMansions ") within established neighborhoods, adjacent to long standing smaller single family residences, is contrary to the established "character" of the neighborhoods in which they are located; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has requested that certain preliminary study and research materials and an amendment to the Land Development Code be prepared and presented to the City Commission for review discussion and adoption; and WHEREAS, the City Manager, staff and the Planning Board have initiated a comprehensive review of the existing regulations; and, WHEREAS, in conjunction with the review it is also appropriate to provide temporary limitations, restrictions and prohibitions in regard to the issuance of building permits for the activities under study, due to the potential detrimental impact upon the existing neigbborhoods of the City; and, Additions shown by unde_,..,,rlinin and deletions shown by wing, Ord, loo. 19 -07 -1920 WHEREAS, although the City Commission is fully cognizant and respectful of the rights of the owners of single family residential properties in the City, the City Commission has determined that the potential for severe and detrimental consequences to the existing single family zoning districts of the City is realistic and likely if the unregulated construction of "McMansions" within the City is permitted to continue, and that the institution of an Interim Development Regulations is both required and justified at this time in order for a proper review and study of the problem and related issues to be conducted; and W_ HEREAS, the Planning Board at its December 12, 2006 meeting, after public hearing, adopted a motion by a vote of 6 ayes 0 nays recommending that the proposed ordinance be disapproved; and WHEREAS, the City Commission at its February 6, 2007 meeting adopted Ordinance No. 03 -07 -1904 which established the same Interim Regulations for single family residential structures for a period of three months which legislation expired on May 5, 2007; and WHEREAS, during the period February 6, 2007 and May 5, 2007 four workshops were held with members of the Planning Board, the Environmental Review and Preservation Board, the Historic Preservation Board, property owners, developers, and other stakeholders; and WHEREAS, an additional three months is now required to prepare an ordinance containing specific regulations to amend the Land Development Code and to conduct public hearings before the Planning Board and City Commission. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; Section Z. No building permits shall be issued for the construction of new, or for additions to existing single family residential structures, which construction shall result in the creation or addition of a second floor to the single fami ,ly structure. Section 2. For a building permit to be issued for either a new, or for an addition/remodel to a single - family structure, the structure shall comply with the dimensional requirements contained in section 20 -3.5 (E) of the South Miami Land Development Code. Section 3(A). The City Commission may waive the second story construction prohibition contained in this Interim Regulation if the proposed project, including site plan and specifications, is brought before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB); the ERPB determines that the proposed structure complies with the applicable sections of the Land Development Code and the City Commission after public hearing determines that: Page 2 of 4 Ord. No. 19 -07 --1920 (a) the interim regulation imposes undue hardship on the applicant; or (b) the development proposed by the applicant will not: (i) result in a material diminution of the privacy of adjoining residential properties; and, (ii) will not result in an obvious departure from the aesthetic character of the immediate vicinity taking into account existing structures and open space; and, (iii) the proposed structure will have no more than a de min_imus impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjoining parcel; or (c) the applicant is proposing to mitigate the effect of the redevelopment by providing adequate safeguards which the Commission finds would adequately mitigate any detrimental impact to the neighborhood. Section 3 (B). The applicant for a waiver bears the burden of establishing sufficient evidence necessary to prove that the criteria contained in Section 3(A) have been satisfied. Section 3 (Q. An application for a waiver must be filed in conjunction with the ERPB application. The application for waiver shall be filed with the Planning Department on a form provided by the director and must include the following information: (a) the name and address of the applicant; (b) the address and legal description of the property; (e} evidence to support the criteria in Section 3(A); and (d) other information that the director may reasonably require to evaluate the waiver application. Section 3 (D }. The director shall make a recommendation to the ERPB and City Commission on each application for waiver. Section 4. Section 20- 6.1(C)(3)(f) is hereby amended, to temporarily expand the powers of the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB), to authorize the ERPB to review all single family residential additions /remodels or new construction, which propose the addition of the second floor. The ERPB in conducting such review shall implement the criteria established in this interim regulation. Page 3 of 4 Ord. No. 19-07- -1920 Section 5. Nothing in this ordinance should be construed or applied to abrogate the vested right of a property owner to develop or utilize his/her property in any other way commensurate with zoning and other regulations, including any required renewal of permits for existing legally erected premises. All site plans and building permits already being reviewed (prior to final passage of this interim regulation) by the City of South Miami's Department of Community Development or having received development approval may proceed forward and shall not be required to complywith this interim stay regulation. Section 6. EXPIRATION. September 5, 2007 This ordinance expires : at 1 1:59 p.m. Section 7. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If a provision of this ordinance or its applications to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance. Section S. EMERGENCY DECLARED; EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Commission finds that the continued development of large single - family "McMansions" will negatively impact residential district within the City and that it is necessary to study and develop standards and regulations that protect the character of the residential communities. The City Commission further finds that this type of construction constitutes an emergency requiring the implementation of this interim regulation. Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 2007. ATTEST: CITY CLERI First Reading _ 5 /15 / 0 7 Second Reading _ 6/5/07 r City AS TO APPROVED: Avw A MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: 5-0 Mayor Feliu: Yea Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Beckman: Yea Commissioner Birts: Yea Commissioner Palmer: Yea PACornm Items1200715- 15- 071LDC Amend Second Story Moratorium Ord Exten.doe Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Excellence, Integrity, Inclusion ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD To: Chair & Members, Environmental Review & Preservat' gn Board Via: Julian H. Pe Planning Direcrof From: Lourdes Cabr a- Hernandez Planner 1 ZT4 Applicant: Cesar Molina & Associates, Inc. Location: 7631 SW 59 Avenue, South Miami Request: NEW CONSTRUCTION Review: Second Review (Final) Date: July 17, 2007 Tuesday 8:30 a.m. Re: ERPB -07 -019 STATUS REPORT: The Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) application was submitted to the Planning Department on March 12, 2007. The City Commission passed and adopted Ordinance No. 03 -07 -1904, on February 6, 2007, authorizing a study relating to the residential construction of two -story homes for a three month period, (a second story construction moratorium). The proposed subject property, which is a two -story home (building) with the detached accessory buildings, is NOT vested. Therefore, with the recommendation from the ERPB, the applicant will proceed to City Commission, which has the authority to waive the two -story prohibition. The applicant, followed by the City Commission's decision will proceed and apply for a building permit at Building Department. Please refer to the attached Ordinance No. 03- 07 -1904, which mandates that a single - family structure shall comply with the dimensional requirements contained in Section 20- 3.5(E) of the Land Development Code. At the April 3, 2007, ERPB meeting the subject property received preliminary approval with the Board's recommendations and staffs conditions are outlined on the ERPB preliminary report dated April 3, 2007. The attached ERPB minutes and preliminary ERPB staff report, dated April 3, 2007, outline those conditions. The ERPB application and report are included for reference. The Board was pleased with the design of the two -story residence including garage, tiki pavilion and detached structure. The accessory use structure consists of a covered terrace with studio and guest bedroom. The Board complimented the architect 'on a well designed home, the design responds architecturally to the environment. For example, the open space and exterior courtyards of the building design scheme, which allows for numerous windows that provide plenty of natural light and cross ventilation. Mr. David Trautman, ERPB chair, motioned for preliminary approval with the following staff's conditions: 1. Pending approval to waive the Second Story Construction Prohibition, Upon receiving the recommendation from the ERPB, the applicant will proceed to City Commission, which has the authority to waive the two -story prohibition. 7631 SW 59 Avenue ERPB -07 -019 presented on July 17, 2007 New Construction: Residential Page 2 of 6 2. Submit the grading and irrigation plan prior to final ERPB; Signed and sealed grading and irrigation plan, May 7, 2007, has been submitted for review and final approval; prepared by Donald A. Northcut, Landscape Architect, sheet C -1, IR -1 and IR -2. 3. Submit the engineering plans prior to final ERPB; and Signed and sealed grading and engineering plans have been attached for your review. (Structural plans: sheet Al, S -1 thru S -3.5, Mechanical plans: M- 1 thru M -3, Electrical plans: sheet E -1 thru E -5, and Plumbing plans: she_ et P- 1.0 thru P -3.0). Additional documentation has been included for reference and consideration of the proposed new construction. These include but are not limited to a site visit and current photographs of the subject property performed by the Planning Department staff, copies of the Building Department's permit record search from the Land Master File Inquiry, Miami -Dade Property Appraiser Tax Records for subject and surrounding properties (totaling eight properties), and photographs of surrounding properties (provided by applicant). Survey and Legal Description: See attached Map of Boundary Survey, signed and sealed by professional surveyor and mapper Walter E. Venega of Caribbean Land Surveyors, Inc., dated April 17, 2006. Existing Conditions: The property as described in the boundary survey is a one story c.b.s. residence with asphalt driveway leading to the double car garage, accessible from the side of the building. The property consists of a swimming pool, jacuzzi and wooden deck. The existing residence and existing swimming pool will be demolished and replaced with the proposed two story single - family residence. The property fronts SW 59 Avenue with a frontage of 110 feet in width, which exceeds the 75 feet minimum frontage requirements set forth in the RS -3 zoning district. The property consists of a side length of 371.01 feet, with a total lot size of 40,810 square feet net area, which exceeds the 10,000 square feet minimum lot size net area set forth in the RS -3 zoning district, Section 20- 3.5(E), Land Development Code. Landscaping Plan: Mr. Donald A. Northcut, Landscape Architect, has implemented and revised the landscape plan, sheet L -1, incorporating Mr. Bedell's (ERPB member) comments from the preliminary (first review) ERPB meeting. Those comments are noted on the ERPB minutes of April 3, 2007 and the revisions are noted on the landscape plan as revision number 1, and dated April 24, 2007. A tree removal permit has been submitted and approved with conditions. Refer to the attached tree removal application, and landscape plan for additional information. Also attached are the Performance Bond Calculation Sheet, Transferal Letter, and a copy of the letter of credit from the Commerce Bank, the applicants' bank. Please refer to these documents for additional information. The landscape plan submitted to the City is consistent with the 7631 SW 59 Avenue ERPB -07 -019 presented on July 17, 2007 New Construction: Residential Page 3of6 requirements set forth in Section 20 -4.5, Land Development Code. The plan includes a detailed description of the landscaping schedule, including tree names and pertinent information. The number of existing trees that will be protected, existing trees to be removed, and trees to be added as part of the proposed project can be found on the proposed landscape plan. Pursuant to Section 20- 4.5(D)(5)(b) of the Land Development Code, the minimum number or trees required for the RS -3 zoning district are three trees per lot. The proposed landscape plan identifies a total of twenty (20), sheet L -1 and L -2. Site Plan (Zoning District: "RS -3" Medium Lot Single- Family Residential District): The intent of this district is to provide for low — density residential development located in a moderately spacious setting which emphasizes the preservation of open space. The proposed site plan depicts a two story residence, which consists of linear spaces with cross ventilation, a swimming pool and outdoor landscape pervious areas. The site plan illustrates slope directions for water retention throughout the lawn areas of the subject property. However, grading and irrigation plans have been submitted for review. Applicant must meet the requirements of the storm water ordinance. The intent of the ordinance is to "require all properties to retain storm water drainage on site . as to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public right-of-way." The building dimensional requirements are guided by Section 20- 3.5(E), Land Development Code. The calculations on the site plan (zoning legend) of the proposed total net site area is (110' -0" x 371' -0 ") 40,810 square feet, which exceeds the minimum total area (10,000 square feet) required by the Land Development Code. The proposed building coverage calculation includes the two -story home (main house) building including covered terraces (1,129.4 square feet), garage (840 square feet), and tiki pavilion (482 square feet) at a sub total of 6,603.4 square feet. The accessory structure (detached) building consists of a covered terrace with studio and guest bedroom (1,525 square feet) at a total of 8,128.4 or 19.9% of the maximum building coverage; that does not exceed the maximum building coverage (12,243 square feet or 30 %) allowed by the Land Development Code. The proposed second floor (2,061.6 square feet or 23.5% of the maximum building coverage allowed for the first floor) does not exceed the maximum allowable building coverage of 3,961.8 square feet at 60% of the first floor (does not include the square footage of the accessory structure (detached). The proposed first floor building front setback (64' --11 "), exceed the 25' -0" feet minimum front setback required. The proposed first floor building rear setback (25' -0 "), comply with the 25' -0" minimum rear setback required. The proposed two story portion of the building is at a front setback (136' -0 "), exceed the 25-0" feet minimum front setback required. The proposed two story portion of the building rear setback (211' -0 "), exceed the 25' -0" feet minimum rear setback required. The proposed first floor building side setbacks (north side 11' -3" and south side 11' -3 "), exceed the required cumulative widths for both side yards. Based on Sec 20- 3.5(E), Land Development Code the side setback shall not be less than 20% of the lot width. 7631 SW 59 Avenue ERPB -07 -019 presented on July 17, 2007 New Construction: Residential Page 4of6 The proposed cumulative width minimum interior side setback shall be no less than 20 percent (22' -0 °) of the total lot width (110 linear feet of lot frontage). The proposed second floor building side setbacks (north side 16' -0" and the south side 16 -0 °), exceed the 15' -0" minimum required second floor side setback The subject property is a narrow and deep lot in configuration and providing greater setbacks than the minimum required has allowed the proposal of additional green area and open spaces on the front and rear yards. Greater setbacks provide other positive impacts, such as a greater separation between the abutting buildings and a greater distance on the visual impact of the two -story building from the right -of -way. The proposed impervious coverage includes the building and detached accessory structure, swimming pool, deck area, coral stone driveway and two ponds. The calculation provided for impervious coverage (14,411.2 square feet or 35.3 %) does not exceed the 40% maximum impervious coverage allowed (16,324 square feet or 40 %) by the Land Development Code. Elevations: The building height dimensions, building finishes and materials are noted on the elevations, sheet number A -5. The front facade, the west elevation, illustrates a symmetrical two -story building with oolite stone at the first floor level. For additional balance and harmony to the facade, a one -story three car garage which is located and accessible by the side is attached with a structure to the foyer, also a one -story structure. The south and north elevations depict the massing (one -story and /or two - story) allowing to determine the negative impact, if any on the abutting properties. The proposed windows, located at the south and north wall of the two -story portion of the building, are located by the stairs and walk -in- closets on either side. The front/west facade of the two -story building consist of a balcony at either side and a hallway that connects to the three proposed bedrooms, facing the front yard to SW 59 Avenue. The rear /east facade of the two -story building consists of a covered terrace, which stretches and also connects to the three bedrooms, which overlook the rear yard. Furthermore, these spaces adjacent to the bedrooms create a buffer between the bedrooms and the exterior, a double wall for privacy. Applicant has submitted photographs of the subject property and photographs of the neighbors whose properties are two -story. An aerial photographs depicting the location of these properties. In addition, ERPB has approved a two -story residence at 7630 SW 59 Avenue, across the street from the subject property. Presentation color renderings of the front and rear yard has been submitted and will be available for review at the ERPB meeting. Pursuant to Section 20- 6.1(C) Environmental Review and Preservation Board (3) Power and Duties O The Board shall review scale, color, texture and appropriateness of all proposed buildings,....the overall compatibility of the proposed development with the existing character of the neighborhood. 7631 SW 59 Avenue ERPB -07 -019 presented on July 17, 2007 New Construction: Residential Page 5 of 6 Site Plan Review Committee: On March 13, 2007, the committee met to review the proposed site plan. In addition, to the site plan review there was a detailed discussion on the second story construction. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 03 -07 -1904 the construction of two -story homes is currently being reviewed and studied for any negative impact on the existing neighborhoods. The location of proposed windows at the second floor and weather or not is a privacy issue was a concern raised by the Planning Director. The design and placement of the proposed two -story was described on the elevations paragraph above and on the buildings dimensional requirements pursuant to Section 20- 3.5(E), Land Development Code. Secondly, Public Works emphasized that the stormwater ordinance must be followed. The intent of the Ordinance is to "require all properties to retain stormwater drainage on site as to prevent development that would result in contributing to or causing recurrent ponding on adjoining properties or public right -of- way." RECOMMENDATION: Final Approval with the following conditions: 1. Pending approval from City Commission to waive the Second Story Construction Moratorium; 2. Meet requirements as set forth in the Adopted Stormwater Ordinance; 3. Meet the requirements as set forth in the Tree Removal Permit Application, and comply with the Tree Removal Permit Relocation Standards, Section 20- 4.5(k), Land Development Code; 4. Must protect existing trees and vegetation during construction; 5. Pursuant to Sec. 20- 3.6(J)(1 -4) Pool enclosures are required for the swimming pool.; and, 6. Any comments and/or suggestions from the Board. Attachments: • ERPB minutes, dated April 3, 2007 • ERPB report, dated April 3, 2007 • ERPB Application, dated March 23, 2007 • Application to Waive Second Story Construction Prohibition • LDC Section 20 -3.1 and Section 20 -3.5E • Application for Tree Removal • Tree Removal Permit Conditions • Addendum to Tree Removal Permit • Performance Bond Calculation Sheet with regulations • Performance Bond Transferal Letter • Letter of Credit from Commerce Bank • Property Survey (24 "x36 ") • Neighborhood Pictures: Two -story • Aerial View of Property • Architectural plans prepared by Cesar Molina & Associates: • Index of Drawings • Perspective Rendering of front • Perspective Rendering of Back • Photographs: Subject and Abutting Properties • General Notes, sht. G1.1 • Storm Water Retaining Plan, sht. C -1 7631 SW 59 Avenue ERPB -07 -019 presented on July 17, 2007 New Construction: Residential - Page 6 of 6 ■ Landscaping plan, sht. L -1 ■ Planting Details, sht. L -2 ■ Irrigation Plan, sht. IR -1 and iR -2 • Site plan, sht. A1.0 • First Floor plan, sht. A2.0 • Second Floor plan, sht. A2.1 • Partial First Floor plan, sht A2.2 -A2.5 • Second Floor plan, sht A2.6 • First Floor General Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.0 • Second Floor Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.1 • Partial Reflected Ceiling Plan, sht.A3.2 -A3.5 ■ Second Floor Reflected Ceiling Paln, sht. A3.6 ■ Roof plan, sht. A4.0 ■ Elevations, sht. A5.0 -A5.1 Building Sections, sht. A6.0 -A6.1 ■ Wall Section, sht. A7.0 -A7.6 ■ Column Detail, sht. A8.0 -A8.0A • Window Sill Detail, sht. A8.1 • Eave Detail, sht. A8.2, A8.2A, A8.3 and A8.4 • Details, sht A8.5 • Windows and Doors Schedule, sht. A10.0 -A10.1 • Architectural Plans by Edward A. Landers, P.E., sht. A -1 • Architectural Plans by Edward A. Landers, P.E., sht. A -1 • Structural Plans by Edward A. Landers, P.E., sht. S -1 — 3.5 • Mechanical Plans by Edward A. Landers, P.E., sht. M -1 -- M -3 • Electrical Plans by Edward A. Landers, P.E., sht. E -1 — E -5 • Plumbing Plans by Edward A. Landers, F.E., sht. P -1.0 -- P -3.0 • Perspective Rendering of Front (24 "x36" Presentation Board to be presented) Perspective Rendering of Back (24'x36" Presentation Board to be presented) LCH Z:IERPBIERPB Agendas12007 ERPB AGENDASIERPB JULY 17, 20071ERPB- 07 -019F - Ordinance 03- 07- 1904.doc ffi2. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8 :30 AM EXCERPT 1. CALL TO ORDER Action:: Mr. Trautman called the meeting to order at 8.40 A.M. I1. ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Chandler, Mr. Bedell, Mr.Balli, Mr. Fernandez, and Mr. Trautman. Board members absent: Mrs. Mark, Mr. Rivera, and Mrs. Morales- Fernandez City staff present: Julian H. Perez (Planning Director), Lourdes Cabrera - Hernandez (Planner), Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Michelle Valerio (Dept. Head Secretary Asst.) 2) NEW CONTRUCTION: FINAL: [ERP]3-07 -019) Applicant: Cesar Molina & Associates Location: 7531 SW 59 Avenue South Miami, FL Request: Applicant is requesting final approval for the new construction. Applicant present: Cesar Molina. Mrs. Cabrera read the item into the record. Action: Mr. Trautman stated that this project is fabulous. Mr. Balli stated that he loves the house. ERPB MINUTES 7 -17 -2007 Pagel of 2 Mr. Chandler agreed with his colleges and mentioned that if all the houses looked as the one referenced above, there would not be a need fors two -story moratorium. Motion: Mr. Trautman moved for final approval as presented including Staff's conditions: 1. Pending approval from City Commission to waive the Second Story Construction Moratorium; 2. Meet the requirements as set forth in the Adopted Stormwater Ordinance; 3. Meet the requirements as set fort in the Tree Removal Permit Application, and comply with the Tree Removal Permit Relocation Standards, Section 20 -4.5 (k), Land Development Code; 4. Must protect existing trees and vegetation during construction and, 5. Pursuant to Sec. 20- 3.6(J)(1 -4) Pool enclosures are required for the swimming pool. Mr. Bedell seconded the motion. Mr. Balli stated that the landscaping illustrated on the colored renderings does not correspond with the proposed landscaping plan for the subject property. Vote: 5 Approved 0 Opposed KAERPMERPB Minutes12007 MinuteslERPB MINS July 17, 2007 - EXCERPT- 07- 019.doe EXCERPT ERP13 MINUTES 7 -17 -2007 Page 2 of 2 u V ~ IhFLORPOR ED 1927 �LOR- CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & PRESERVATION BOARD REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES Tuesday, April 3, 2007 8:30 AM EXCERPT I. CALL TO ORDER Action: Mr. Trautman, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. IL ROLL CALL Action: Mr. Trautman performed roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mr. Trautman, Ms. Maria Mr. Balli, Mr. Chandler, Mr. Jude, and Mr. Rivera Board Members Absent: Mr. Bedell and Mrs. Morales- Fernandez Future Board Member: Mr. Hector Fernandez City staff present: Lourdes Cabrera - Hernandez (Planner), Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Michelle Valerio (Dept. Head Secretary Asst.) III. REQUESTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1) NEW CONSTRUCTION: [ERPB -07 -019] Applicant: Cesar Molina and Associates Location: 7631 SW 59 Avenue South Miami, FL Request: Applicant is requesting approval for a new construction. EXCERPT ERPB WNUTES O4 -3 -07 Page 1 of 2 Applicant present: Mr. Cesar Molina Action: At today's meeting the Board, staff, and applicant discussed the request. Mr. Balli suggested that canopy trees be added considering the landscape appears to include palm trees only. Mr. Chandler expressed that this project was exceptionally elegant and although it is a two - story home with a setback of 120 feet away from the street, it will not be noticed. Mr. Bedell did not attend the meeting but he e- mailed his comments to staff member Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez. Mr. Bedell made four comments. First, Drawing L -2 contains very little information that is not on drawing L -1. if the information that is unique to L -2 were added to L -1, L -2 could be omitted. Second, the redrawing L- 1/L -2: The location of "1113B Hong Kong Orchid Cluster" is not obvious and requested that it be clarified. Mr. Bedell recommended the abandonment of the Orchid tree cluster. Third, the plans for the Tree Removal Permit indicated the relocation of a Plumeria, however the tree removal is not included in the permit application. Fourth, the landscape plans lathed the installation of shrub. He stated that shrubs should be installed around the air conditioning equipment and as indicated on the renderings. Motion: Mr. Chandler motioned to have a preliminary approval of the project under the recommendations made by the Board. Mr. Trautman seconded the motion. Vote: Approved: 6 Opposed: 0 Absent: Ms. Morales - Fernandez and Mr. Bedell K:IERPBIERPB Minutes12007 MinuteslEXCERPT M1NS APRIL 3, 2007 ERPB- 07- 019.doe EXCERPT ERPB MINUTES O4 -3 -07 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PRESERVATION BOARD APPLICATION STREET ADDRESS OF JOB: SOUTH MIAMI, FL PROPERTY OWNER: yt TEL. NO. SOS— 'i -Jr," I Q l ADDRESS: 3` i'7 1 ( :;,(xl uc- . `7[ Ji R 1 41 I A M I R J STREET CITY I .CTA777 7m VIRAT TS TT-TF. PRF.¢FMT T K17 n -MV P12r1PFRTV9 PLEASE, BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORD TO BE PERFORMED: zj C tC N 1 �;:s I D tLr C- WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? APPLICANT'S NAME: - . ( slit C (a TEL NO. —.305 " �(Vg— `/ 2D0 ADDRESS:. oC A mq-Aws ul Ao ( -z � "I "I w E 3 STREET CITY STATE FAX NUMBER: 5` LI 9 � 1 5..... - -- A4TTTR APP7.1f'ANIT PLPACF TMTITC'ATP VATIP OPT ATTnNTCIITT)'MTTTTQ 1)1711Mf1'r SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE BUSINESS OFFICE RETAIL STORE OTHER: AUTO REPAIR APARTMENT OR TOWNHOUSE MEDICAL OFFICE PLEASE, BRIEFLY SUMMARIZE THE WORD TO BE PERFORMED: zj C tC N 1 �;:s I D tLr C- WHAT WILL THE TOTAL COST BE TO COMPLETE THIS PROJECT? APPLICANT'S NAME: - . ( slit C (a TEL NO. —.305 " �(Vg— `/ 2D0 ADDRESS:. oC A mq-Aws ul Ao ( -z � "I "I w E 3 STREET CITY STATE FAX NUMBER: 5` LI 9 � 1 5..... - -- A4TTTR APP7.1f'ANIT PLPACF TMTITC'ATP VATIP OPT ATTnNTCIITT)'MTTTTQ 1)1711Mf1'r INDICATE CONTACT PERSON PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT OTHER (provide name and address) 4 SIGN YOUR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE 's decision will be mailed to the contact person indicated 15�. --yQ7 DATE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY TENANT / LESSEE CONTRACTOR OTHER: OWNER OF THE BUSINESS ARCHITECT ENGINEER INDICATE CONTACT PERSON PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT OTHER (provide name and address) 4 SIGN YOUR NAME ON THE LINE ABOVE 's decision will be mailed to the contact person indicated 15�. --yQ7 DATE Gtv of South Miami P anning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663 -6326; Fax: (305) 668 -7356 Application To Waive Second Story Construction Prohibition PART I Address of Subject Property: 163 f �t.X/.`��,, �Ut`" Lots) Block Subdivision 7-#0- 110 -peer aFWerr- 346 Fr. 0 p-Tpe- Nn �c � of rr�G I'�c6�TfFt+��r' Yy OF rK4rsovrf�i�rf'%� Meets & Bounds;' rH��r�rR r / 5 cr�w�s 7t�rd+t S�rlF, R v6cF a rtt Applicant: Phone: �� !ilvc�za 305- YLOlyZ 40 Address:' / .232- 91 11WI- OXIA A/O- , Sui r-� /Ol , rcw n L f 43 Property Owner: 13ATy�960 ,twrn1v.. 1/, VIW?-Sig nature: ` Mailing Address: Phone, Architect/Engineer: Phone: C cSt�l� - toc�tiA pia �sStxJs TEs 3 as - LI xy `ti,070a AS THE APPLICANT, PLEASE INDICATE YOUR RELATIONSHIP TO THIS PROJECT: ,Owner Owner's Representative Contract to purchase _Option to purchase Tenant/Lessee NOTE: (1) Applicant must complete Part Y and Part YY of this application; (2) Applicant must file ERPB Application. The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge and belief. 12-Z Amcw �K Applicant's Signature and tit e 07,//3/07- Date Upon receipt, a plications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable regulations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applicant. OFFICE USE ONLY: bate Filed 9�• I2. of Application Accepted by j 4 Date 3 %!� U7Date of ERPB Hearing CA- -02- b7 ERPB Case No. DI -- O i Gi 217107 W Application To wive Second Story Construction Prohibition PART II Pursuant to Ordinance No. 03 -07-1904 the City Commission may waive the second story construction prohibition if the proposed project, including site plan and specifications, is brought before the Environmental Review and Preservation Board (ERPB) and the ERPB determines that the proposed structure complies with the applicable sections of the Land Development Code and the meets the criteria set forth below. The applicant for a waiver must provide sufficient evidence in the form of written communication and/or graphics necessary to prove that the criteria (a), (b), and (c) listed below are applicable to their project and thereby justifies the granting of a waiver of the prohibition. (a) the interim regulation imposes undue hardship on the applicant; or (b) the development proposed by the applicant will not: (i) result in a material diminution of the privacy of adjoining residential properties; and, (ii) will not result in an obvious departure from the aesthetic character of the immediate vicinity taking into account existing structures and open space; and, (iii) the proposed structure will have no more than a de minimus impact on the use and enjoyment of the adjoining parcel; or (c) the applicant is proposing to mitigate the effect of the redevelopment by providing adequate safeguards which the Commission finds would adequately mitigate any detrimental impact to the neighborhood. P :IForms\PD Application To Waive 2nd Story Prohibition.doe ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.1 ARTICLE III. ZONING REGULATIONS 20 -3.1 Zoning use districts and purposes. (A) Zoning Districts Established. In order to implement the intent of this Code and the city's adopted Comprehensive Plan, the City is hereby divided into eighteen (18) zoning use. districts with the symbol designations and general purposes listed below and permitted uses set forth in Section 20- 3.3(D). A planned unit development (PUD) district is also created in Section 20 -3.7. Standards shall be uniform throughout each zoning use district. District symbols and names shall be known as: Symbol RT-9 RM -18 RM -24 RO LO MD NR SR GR TODD H PI PR HP -0V ,(B) District Purpose Statements. Name Estate Residential Semi- Estate Residential Low Density Single - Family Single - Family Single - Family (50' lots) Townhouse Residential Two-Familyllbwnhouse Residential. Low Density Multi- Family Residential Medium Density Multi- Family Residential Residential Office Law- Inteasity Office Medium- intensity Office Neighborhood Retail. Specialty Retail General Retail Transit - Oriented Development District Hospital Public/Institutional Parks and Recreation. Historic Preservation. Overlay "RS -3° Medium Lot Single - Family Residential District. The purpose of this district is to provide for low- density single- family residential development located in a moder- ately spacious setting which emphasizes the preservation of open space. This district is appropriate in areas designated "Single- Family" on the city's adopted Comprehen- sive PIan. Supp. No. 9 20 -3.5 (D) Reserrmed. REQUIREMENT Min, Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) Frontage (ft.) Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front Rear Side (Interiorly SOUTH MIAMI LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 20 -3.5E DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE- FAMILY DISTRICTS RS -1 R8-2 R3 3 RS-4 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 125 100 75 60 60 35 25 25 25 25 25 25 For struc- 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b tore 12' or less in height, as mea- sured from the first floor finished floor ele- vation Portion of structure above 12' high as mea- sured from the first floor finished floor ele- vation 12S -5 6,000 50 25 25 7.6b 25 20 15` 100 7.5 Side (Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max. Building Height Stories „ 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max. Building Coverage ('Yo) First floor 20 30 30 30 30 Second 60 60 60 60 60 floor-% of the first floor Max. Impervious Coverage (%) 30 40 40 45 45 R Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. For pre- existing improved lots of record in the RS3 or RS4 districts, that are 50 feet or less in lot width, the second floor setback shall be the same as the first floor setback. Supp. No. 8 50• -� MY OF SOUM MAW Planning & Zoning Department City H4 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33I43 Phone: 305.663.6326 or 6347; Fax: 305.666.4591 APPLICATION FOR TREE REMOVAL Project Address: '7 6 3 ! S '-'J J" '�p A V South Mi ,_... amt, Florida Property Owner: sgd N 77 A t 0 Phone:"-305- 7] 0. 37-1? Address: Work To Be Peri'onned By (check one): - Contractor OwnerlB der j� Contractor. —T-B D Phone: Address: This application is for the removal of (be c): U M 9) 0 �t 05� q G� �L 1S4 A143 171b-VA'-5 _ RP. %ciG% TIlJII% +;1 - lz'5,�5S I Auoc4rlo, E Ft> c.t,4mrV : Use ofProPefty (check one): Commercial Sixmtmr of Contractor/QuaMer . Notary; �,�QgYpG�.,�+ Lucia Ganth#er Notary: ; ...�.� Expires: DEC. 18, 2010 Two copies ofa sitePlAn m&ortrw survey must be included. K,„ti��` www.Ap QNN0TpPry6m . Depending on the type of t *s), the fej°r for a tree removal.pcm3it is $50.00. This permit may be approved with conditions, limitations, andlor restrictions. Conditions,, ]imitations, restrictions, if any: � �rli QGc�CS rH ue5fiff►� ah f ©... .�,... I ✓C' i�(� [ c�.�-e. �r,,_g1a�°r- �p�•r.�rr e r��'��rx i � S � av� bey yr t/Se� rec owrr�re � � J�`a Q �• � rnl�t� e, tN .r �- � `r�'f� -S c2-° tFZ+o -t . • .. •f 1 _ ., .n Y�f -� A .nn � .1l r7 . ]� n _ �i 1 a .S . '7 � CITY OF SOUTHMM MI PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'free Removal Permit Conditions March 8, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59th Avenue South Miami, Fl 33143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit Relocation Standards Section 20- 4.5(K) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, Trees other than palms: a. Tree roots shall be severed in such a manner as to provide a root ball which is sufficient to ensure survival of the tree when relocated. A sufficiently -sized planting hole shall be provided at the relocation site to ensure successful re- growth; b. After root severing, adequate time shall be allowed prior to replanting to ensure survival of the tree(s). After root severing and prior to relocation, tree(s) shall be watered a minimum of twice weekly; and, after relocation, said tree(s) shall be watered a minimum of twice weekly until the tree(s) are established; c. During removal and transportation of the tree, the root ball and vegetative portions of the tree shall be protected from damage from wind or injury; and, d. Any tree that dies or becomes nonviable within one (1) year of relocation shall be replaced according to the standards set forth in Section 20- 4.5(.1)(2) & (3) of the Land Development. Code. 2. Palms: a. A ball of earth at least one (1) foot from the base of the trees shall be moved with the tree; b. Fronds shall be securely tied around the bud prior to relocation and shall remain securely tied around the bud during the entire relocation process and for a minimum of one (1) week after relocation; and, c. Any palm that dies or becomes nonviable within one (1) year of relocation shall be replaced according to the standards set forth in Section 20- 4.5(7)(2) & (3) of the Land Development Code. 3. Preservation credit for relocated trees. Permittees who successfully relocate trees shall receive full credit for the relocated trees and the tree replacement requirements herein shall not apply to such relocated trees. All relocated trees shall meet the standards set forth above. ZATree Protection Ord RemovahTree Removal Permits1763 t SW 59 Avenue\Tree Removal Conditions Fonndoc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 - 663 -6326 * FAX: 305- 668 -7356 South Miami F orida it v 1� - f CITY OF SOUTHMM MI PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'free Removal Permit Conditions March 8, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59th Avenue South Miami, Fl 33143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit Relocation Standards Section 20- 4.5(K) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, Trees other than palms: a. Tree roots shall be severed in such a manner as to provide a root ball which is sufficient to ensure survival of the tree when relocated. A sufficiently -sized planting hole shall be provided at the relocation site to ensure successful re- growth; b. After root severing, adequate time shall be allowed prior to replanting to ensure survival of the tree(s). After root severing and prior to relocation, tree(s) shall be watered a minimum of twice weekly; and, after relocation, said tree(s) shall be watered a minimum of twice weekly until the tree(s) are established; c. During removal and transportation of the tree, the root ball and vegetative portions of the tree shall be protected from damage from wind or injury; and, d. Any tree that dies or becomes nonviable within one (1) year of relocation shall be replaced according to the standards set forth in Section 20- 4.5(.1)(2) & (3) of the Land Development. Code. 2. Palms: a. A ball of earth at least one (1) foot from the base of the trees shall be moved with the tree; b. Fronds shall be securely tied around the bud prior to relocation and shall remain securely tied around the bud during the entire relocation process and for a minimum of one (1) week after relocation; and, c. Any palm that dies or becomes nonviable within one (1) year of relocation shall be replaced according to the standards set forth in Section 20- 4.5(7)(2) & (3) of the Land Development Code. 3. Preservation credit for relocated trees. Permittees who successfully relocate trees shall receive full credit for the relocated trees and the tree replacement requirements herein shall not apply to such relocated trees. All relocated trees shall meet the standards set forth above. ZATree Protection Ord RemovahTree Removal Permits1763 t SW 59 Avenue\Tree Removal Conditions Fonndoc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 - 663 -6326 * FAX: 305- 668 -7356 The permit is approved with the following conditions: 1. Proper root pruning should be performed over at least six (6) months. 2. In the event that any tree or palm that is listed above dies or becomes nonviable within one (1) year of relocation, it shall be replaced according to the standards set forth in Section 20- 45(J)(2) & (3) of the land Development Code. 3. failures to plant, preserve, or maintain each individual tree shall be considered a separate violation of the Land Development Code. 4. The trees are not removed until the ERPB has issued its final approval for the site plan. (2A Af T7&i 0 41vkk& the legal owner /agent A'��iign lace n tree removal permit. of the above referenced project agree with the 317 A :�- Date Sw rn to me and subscribed to me this I day of 2007 Publid Wary NkeNa Payne My co ission expires: commission OD255a47 OF FV FXOLDs October 05, 2007 ZATree Protection Ord RemovallTree Removal Permits17631 SW 59 Avenue\Tree Removal Conditions Form.doc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, EL 33143 TEL: 305 -663 -6326 4 FAX: 305 - 668 -736 CITY OF SO UTH MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT Addendum to Tree Removal Permit March 12, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59'h Avenue South Miami, F133143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. The intent of this addendum is to legally revise the Tree Removal Agreement entered into with Mr. Santiago Alvarez on March 9, 2007, for the subject property. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit ---- Submittals Section 20- 4.5(1)(4)(d) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, i. A performance bond to guarantee compliance with all conditions, limitations, and restrictions of the tree removal permit, including, but not limited to, planting of all required replacement trees. ii. The bond shall be equivalent to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the estimated cost of the permitted activity and may be in the form of a letter of credit, surety, cash, or certificate of deposit. iii. All performance bonds shall remain in force for a minimum of either one (1) year after the actual completion date of the permitted activity (to ensure that any replanted trees which perish are replaced), or until viability of all replanted trees has been achieved, which ever occurs last. iv. At the discretion of the Planning Director, performance bonds may be partially released in phases based upon partial completion of planting or other permit requirements. The calculated value of the bond shall not exceed S5,175. I SA'� a I-1%aa"& legal owner /agent of the above referenced project agree with the co '- lace n i e removal permit. Signature to (fill Sworn to me nd ubscribed to me this ay of !Auch , 2007 UY,c�T lykenga Payne Public Notary MY Commission DD255847 My commission xpires: Expires Oftber05, 2007 ZATree Protection Ord Removaffree Removal Pennits17631 SW 59 Avenue\Addendum 3 -12 -2007 Tree Removal Agreement.doc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 -663 -6326 + FAX: 305 -668 -7356 South Miami CITY OF SO UTH MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT Addendum to Tree Removal Permit March 12, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59'h Avenue South Miami, F133143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. The intent of this addendum is to legally revise the Tree Removal Agreement entered into with Mr. Santiago Alvarez on March 9, 2007, for the subject property. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit ---- Submittals Section 20- 4.5(1)(4)(d) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, i. A performance bond to guarantee compliance with all conditions, limitations, and restrictions of the tree removal permit, including, but not limited to, planting of all required replacement trees. ii. The bond shall be equivalent to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the estimated cost of the permitted activity and may be in the form of a letter of credit, surety, cash, or certificate of deposit. iii. All performance bonds shall remain in force for a minimum of either one (1) year after the actual completion date of the permitted activity (to ensure that any replanted trees which perish are replaced), or until viability of all replanted trees has been achieved, which ever occurs last. iv. At the discretion of the Planning Director, performance bonds may be partially released in phases based upon partial completion of planting or other permit requirements. The calculated value of the bond shall not exceed S5,175. I SA'� a I-1%aa"& legal owner /agent of the above referenced project agree with the co '- lace n i e removal permit. Signature to (fill Sworn to me nd ubscribed to me this ay of !Auch , 2007 UY,c�T lykenga Payne Public Notary MY Commission DD255847 My commission xpires: Expires Oftber05, 2007 ZATree Protection Ord Removaffree Removal Pennits17631 SW 59 Avenue\Addendum 3 -12 -2007 Tree Removal Agreement.doc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 -663 -6326 + FAX: 305 -668 -7356 CITY Of SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT Performance Bond Calculation Sheet March 20, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59th Avenue South Miami, F133143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. The intent of this calculation sheet is to provide the calculations in regards to the requirements of the performance bond. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit — Submittals Section 20- 4.5(I)(4)(d) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, i. A performance bond to guarantee compliance with all conditions, limitations, and restrictions of the tree removal permit, including, but not limited to, planting of all required replacement trees. H. The bond shall be equivalent to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the estimated cost of the permitted activity and may be in the form of a letter of credit, surety, cash, or certificate of deposit. iii. All performance bonds shall remain in force for a minimum of either one (1) year after the actual completion date of the permitted activity (to ensure that any replanted trees which perish are replaced), or until viability of all replanted trees has been achieved, which ever occurs last. iv. At the discretion of the Planning Director, performance bonds may be partially released in phases based upon partial completion of planting or other permit requirements. The calculated value of the bond shall not exceed $5,175. Therefore, the calculations are as follows: 1. To calculate the price for one Oak Tree — the Conversion is $75 per foot of tree. In this case, the trees are each 15 feet tall. Therefore: 75 $ Foot x 15 = $1,125 .Foot 1 2. There are four (4) Oak Trees that need to be relocated, therefore the price for all four (4) trees is: $1,125 x 4 = $4,500 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 -663 -6326 4 FAX: 305- 668 -7356 South Miami _= ;E F l o r i d a 1W'NleticsCRT 2441 CITY Of SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT Performance Bond Calculation Sheet March 20, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 59th Avenue South Miami, F133143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (5) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. The intent of this calculation sheet is to provide the calculations in regards to the requirements of the performance bond. Pursuant to the Tree Removal Permit — Submittals Section 20- 4.5(I)(4)(d) of the City of South Miami Land Development Code, i. A performance bond to guarantee compliance with all conditions, limitations, and restrictions of the tree removal permit, including, but not limited to, planting of all required replacement trees. H. The bond shall be equivalent to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the estimated cost of the permitted activity and may be in the form of a letter of credit, surety, cash, or certificate of deposit. iii. All performance bonds shall remain in force for a minimum of either one (1) year after the actual completion date of the permitted activity (to ensure that any replanted trees which perish are replaced), or until viability of all replanted trees has been achieved, which ever occurs last. iv. At the discretion of the Planning Director, performance bonds may be partially released in phases based upon partial completion of planting or other permit requirements. The calculated value of the bond shall not exceed $5,175. Therefore, the calculations are as follows: 1. To calculate the price for one Oak Tree — the Conversion is $75 per foot of tree. In this case, the trees are each 15 feet tall. Therefore: 75 $ Foot x 15 = $1,125 .Foot 1 2. There are four (4) Oak Trees that need to be relocated, therefore the price for all four (4) trees is: $1,125 x 4 = $4,500 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 -663 -6326 4 FAX: 305- 668 -7356 Pursuant to Section 20- 4.5(I)(4)(d)(ii) of the Land Development Code, The bond shall be equivalent to one hundred fifteen percent (115 %) of the estimated cost of the permitted activity and may be in the form of a letter of credit, surety, cash, or certificate of deposit. Therefore: 4500$ x 115% = 5,175$ ZATree Protection Ord Removaffree Removal PennitsW631 SW 59 AvenueWerformance Bond Calculation Sheet - Tree Removal Agreement. doc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 - 663 -6326 P FAX: 305- 668 -7356 South Miami s X31 f F on d �� ;`t � ��,;�� � r� ' ; { ,; All•xmerlsat CITY 2001 CITY OF SOUTHMI"I PLANNING DEPARTMENT Performance Bond. Transferal Letter March 23, 2007 Applicant: Santiago Alvarez Project address: 7631 SW 591h Avenue South Miami, Fl 33143 APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant has filed for a tree removal permit for the relocation of four (4) Oak trees; five (S) Gumbo Limbos; 4 Christmas Palms; one (1) Avocado tree and one (1) Poinciana. The intent of this transferal letter is to relocate the Letter of Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, No. COMMS300662; provided by the above listed applicant from the possession of the Planning & Zoning Department to the Finance Department. This Letter is to be held until such time it has been deemed that -all of the agreed upon Work as listed above has be successfully completed, and the conditions as set forth in Section 20- 4.5(K) have been met. Director offhe Planning Dep4,Vent Date Print Vamt -3- c9 ,9D Date Print Z_Uree Protection Ord RemovahTree Removal Perrnits17631 SW 59 AvenoelPerformance Bond Transfer Letter - Tree Removal Agreement.doc 6130 SUNSET DRIVE SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 TEL: 305 - 663 -6326 ® FAX: 305 -668 -7356 Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit. March 21, 2007 BENEFICIARY CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Planning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami Fl. 33143 fd1`L DEPT Sdiuw We hereby issue our irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. COMMS300662 For the account of: SANTIAGO ALVAREZ 7631 SW 59 th Avenue South Miami, Fl. 33143 Amount: US$5,175.00 Date and Place of Expiry: MARCH 21, 2008 AT OUR COUNTERS This Standby Letter of Credit is available with COMMERCEBANK, N.A, by payment against presentation of the Documents detailed herein and of your draft(s) at sight drawn on COMMERCEBANK, N.A. Beneficiary's original statement purportedly signed by an officer of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, certifying that: "The amount of draft represents funds due as a result of failure of SANTIAGO ALVAREZ to pay (obligations, invoices, etc.) as agreed ". That demand for payment has been made and that payment has not been received from SANTIAGO ALVAREZ or any other source ". Original Letter of Credit and. amendments (If any) Partial drawings are allowed pursuant to the requirements set forth in section 20-4.5 (1) (4) (d) of CITY OF SOUTH iVIIAi1fII LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, Each draft must state that it is: "Drawn under Commercebank, N.A., Standby Letter of Credit No. COMMS300662 and the amount thereof endorsed on this Standby Letter of Credit. We hereby engage with drawers, endorsers, and Bona Fide holders of drafts drawn under and in compliance with the terms and conditions of this credit that the same shall be duly honored upon due presentation and delivery of documents as requested to'drawee. This Standby Letter of Credit is issued subject to the International Standby Practices 1998 (ISP98) n Y 4'oo Saen? 2- BS-227 iqnry . 30 9 1A i2 SWI 0413MUS3 Sunrise School of Miami: 8795 SW 112th St., i Miami. 3 05- 274 -6562 or sunrises - choolofmiami.com: e Open registration for grades pre -K through eighth grade with education in the Waldorf tradition. o Accepting applications for the 2007 -2008 school year. m Curriculum includes Spanish, music, art, movement and practical arts. Tamiami Child Development Center: 860 SW 76th Ct., Miami. 305 -261 -4133: e. Open Registration for infants, preschool,- Voluntary Pre -K (VPK) and before- and after - school care programs are available. e An APPLE and Gold Seal accredited Center offering A Beka and Creative Curriculum to ready preschooler for kin - dergarten. e Open 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. Temple Betas Am Day School: 5950 North Kendall Dr., Pine - crest. 305 -665 -6228: ® Accepting applications for the 2007 -2008 school year for Jr. prenursery through fifth grade, offering a nurturing and challenging curriculum with low teacher to student ratios.. e Call to schedule a tour. The Thinking Child Learning Center: 35 SW Sixth Ave., Miami. 786 -243 -2556: e Registration is now open for the.toddler program. e The school offers CORE knowledge preschool curricu- lum, large outdoor playground. Tropical Elementary: 4545 SW 104th Ave., South Miami -Dade. 305 -221 -0284: • Registration is open. United Way Center for Excel- lence in Early Education: 3250 SW Third Ave., Miami. 305 -646 -7472: e Accepting Head Start and Early Head Start applications for children 6 weeks to 5 years old. Expectant mothers may also apply. e Tuition is free for families who meet the federal income eligibility requirements. a The program provides com- munity -based services and partnerships, comprehensive child development .services, health, social and disability ser- vices and parental involvement. University Christian Children's Center: 6750 Sunset Dr., South Miami. 305- 661 -8584: e Accredited by National Association for the Education of Young Chifdren and serves children 1 -4 years old with full - and half -day programs. Wayside Baptist Preschool: 7701 SW 98th St., Kendall. 305- 595 -0570: e Registration is open for the 2007 -2008 school year for children ages 3 months through kindergarten. o Part -time hours are 8:45 a.m. -12:15 p.m. and full -time is 7:30 a.m. -6 p.m. o Offers a loving, caring, Christ - centered environment, small classes, creative activi- ties, outdoor play and reading readiness. Whispering Pines Elementary: 18929 SW 89th Rd., Cutler Bay. 305- 238 -7382: s Registration is open for the 2007 -2008 school -year: 9 a.m: -T p.m. Monday through Friday. School Scene is compiled by Jenny Garcia. Send items at least TO days in advance to via e -mail to schoolnews @Mia- miFlerald.com or mail them to School Scene, c% Neighbors, 7300 North Kendall Dr., Ste. 200, Miami, 1=L 33156. COURTESY NOTICE F� CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA' .ne.' On Tuesday, August 7, 2007, beginning at 7:30 p.m., in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Chive, the City Commission will hold Public Hearings to consider the following items: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20- 6:1(D) OFTHE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDERTO INCREASETHE NUMBER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS FROM SEVEN TO NINE AND TO DESIGNATE THAT TWO MEMBERS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD SHALL BE REGISTERED ARCHITECTS. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20 -4.4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO ADD A NEW SECTION 20- 4.4(L)(6) TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A SPECIAL EVENTS PARKING PERMIT TO ALLOW 15 OR MORE CARS TO BE PARKED DURING A SPECIAL EVENT IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 20 -5.6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE FOR THE DEFERRAL OF AN APPLICATION SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS; AMENDING SECTION 15 -4.7 ENTITLED "FALSE ALARM SERVICE CHARGES, ENFORCEMENT AND REVOCATION PROVISIONS" BY EXEMPTING SENIOR CITIZENS FROM FALSE ALARM CHARGES. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE EMULATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; THE AMENDMENTS ARE TO THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES FOR THE FOLLOWING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE; TRANSPORTATION; HOUSING; INFRASTRUCTURE; CONSERVATION; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE; INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION; AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR REVIEW. A RESOLUTION IN RESPONSE TO A PETITION OF AN ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER APPROVING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF 187 FEET OF UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAY PORTION OF SW 68TH AVENUE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF 6780 SW 69TH TERRACE MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN A LEGAL DESCRIPTION SET FORTH HEREIN; SUBJECT TO PROPERTY OWNER PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OFALL LEGAL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE ABANDONMENT. A RESOLUTION RELATING TO A WAIVER OF THE SECOND STORY CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITION IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO -STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 7631 SW 59 AVENUE WITHIN AN RS 3 "LOW- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT," BASED UPON A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL HAV NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD. If you have any Inquiries on the above items please contact the City Clerk's office at: 305 -663 -6326. ALL interested parties are invited to attend and will be heard. Maria M, Menendez, CRIC City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 288.0105; the City hereby advises the public that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will need a record of the proceedings, and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes thestcstimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. is 0 0 r r a a z a an a ur x a LU r 0 E O a� ►.M LL x MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW PubEshed Cady except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miami -Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADS: Before the undersigned authority personally appearad O.V. FERBEYRE, who on oath says that he or she is the SUPERVISOR, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review, t/Wa Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in WamFDade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 7, 2007 in the XXXX Court, was published in said newspaper in the issues of 07/27/2007 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, fora period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertise for pubfication in the said newspaper. Swam to and subscribed before me this .t 27 ot�LY 007 - (SEAL) _ W. PJA1.MESy NOTARY Pt13fJC STALE OF FLOiftDA O.V. FEREtEYRE personally knc Commission #DD293855 Expires: MARCH 04, 2008 CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HERESYgiven th tthe City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida will conduct Public Hearings at its mqulat City Commission meeting scheduled ki- Tuesday, August 7, 2007 beginning at 7a0 p.m in the City Commission Chambers, 6130 Sunset Drive, to consider the fallowing leans: . AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH: MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 20-6.1 (D) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN _ ORDER TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS FROM SEVEN TO NINE AND TO DESIGNATE. THAT TWO MEMBERS OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD .SHALL ' BE REGISTERED ARCHITECTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERAB!U- TY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTNEDATE. AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND C]ippel COMMISSION OF THE CRY OF Bbt1TH MIAMI, FLMDA AMENDING SEC-f10N 204.4 OF TA9 LAND DEIP.OPMENF CODE IN ORDER TO ADD A NEW 9ECTION,@04.4(1_)(6) TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE REOUIRINGgHji1SSUANCE OF A SPECIAL - EVENTS PARKING PERMIT X4rALLOW 1s OR MORE CARS TO BE PARKED DURING_#'SPECIAL EVENT IN RES €DEN- TiALZOMNG DISTRICTS'PROftING FOR SEVERABILFTY, ORDINANCES . IN CONFLICT. NAND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE- AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENO;NG SECTION 20-5 -6 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A PROCEDURE FOR THE DEFERRAL OF AN APPLICATION SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN ONFLICT, ANDPROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. . AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS; AMENDING SECTION 154.7 ENTITLED 'FALSE ALARM SERVICE CHARGES, ENFORCEMENT AND REVOCATION PROVISIONS' BY EXEMPTING SENIOR CITIZENS FROM FALSE ALARM CHARGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTtt MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE EVAULAT10N AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) BASED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTH MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; THE AMENDMENTS ARE TO THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES FOR THE FOLLOW- ING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ELEMENTS: FUTURE LAND USE; TRANSPORTATION; HOUSING; INFRASTRUCTURE; CONSERVATION; RECREAT €ON AND OPEN SPACE; INTER GOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION; AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS; AUTHORIZING TRANSMITTAL TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS FOR REVIEW; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. _ A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY CGMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI. FLORIDA IN RESPONSE TO A PETITION OF AN -ABLrMNG PROPERTY :OWNER ` APPROVING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT 6F 187 FEET OF UNIMPROVED RIGHT -OF -WAY PORTION OF SW 68TH AVENUE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF 6780 SW 69TH TERRACE MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN A LEGAL .. DESCRIPTION SET FORTH HEREIN; SUBJECT TO PROP- - EFITY OWNER PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF ALL LEGAL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE ABANDON- MEW: PROVIDING FOR ANEFFECTNEDATE. -- A AES-OLIMON OF THE MAYOfi AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI; FLORIDA RELATING TO A WAIVER OF THE SECOND -STORY CONSTRUCTION PROHIBITION IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANEW TWO- STORY, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 7631 SW 59 AVENUE-WITHIN AN RS- 3'LOW- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT,' BASED UPON A FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION WILL HAVE NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - _ If you have any Inquiries on the above items pfease contact the City Clerk's office at 305 -663 -6340 p - ALL interested- par0as are invited to affend and will be heard. Maria M. Menendez. CMG City Clerk Pursuant to Florida Statutes 266.0105, the City hereby advises the public %hat if a person decides to appeal any decision made by this Board, Agency or Commission with respect to any matter 8onsidered at its meeting or hearing, he or she will-need a record of the proceedings,; and that for such purpose, affected person may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. - - 7127 . - - 07372f866969M