No preview available
 /
     
Res. No. 064-08-12661A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, CALLING ON THE MIAMI -DADE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO OPPOSE ANY EXTENSION TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY AT THE PRESENT TIME, TO ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND ADHERENCE TO THE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN AS CURRENTLY ADOPTED, INCLUDING THE ADOPTED 2003 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami recognize that The City South Miami is impacted significantly by Miami -Dade County's Planning, Zoning, and County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) policy; and, WHEREAS, The City of South Miami wishes to work with its sister municipalities and Miami -Dade County, in a regional manner, for fair, wise, and mutually beneficial policies; and, WHEREAS, The City of South Miami is aware that Miami -Dade County is under increasing pressure to extend the Urban Development Boundary (UDB) further south and west in order to allow greater, and sometimes intense, development activity to occur; and, WHEREAS, The City of South Miami considers extension of the UDB at this time to have significant negative impacts for both itself and the region, including increased traffic, inadequately funded or unfunded increased costs for the provision of potable water, waste water, storm water, schools, parks and open space, county and municipal services including police, fire, and social services; and, WHEREAS, The City of South Miami prioritizes comprehensive development policies that ensure continued FDOT funding of transit projects and, WHEREAS, The City of South Miami has reviewed the Department of Community Affairs recommendations against expansion of the UDB at this time and, WHEREAS, The County's adopted 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the CDMP recommends against extending the UDB, and reports infill housing land to be in adequate supply through at least year 2020, eliminating the need to extend the UDB at this time; and, WHEREAS, Municipalities are still engaged in their own state - mandated EAR's and should have adequate time to finish without so major an amendment to the County's CDMP hanging in the balance; and, Additions shown by underlining and deletions shown by evef�. Res. No. 64-08-12661 WHEREAS, Miami-Dade County is legally obligated to participate with state and federal efforts to restore the Greater Everglades Ecosystem, which could be significantly impacted if the UDB is moved, and proper analysis of those impacts is not complete and should not be preempted; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission call upon Miami-Dade County to oppose any extension of the UDB at this time, and alternatively to adopt policy to encourage infill development in accord with the currently adopted CDMP and EAR: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA; Section 1. The City of South Miami hereby advises Miami-Dade County and its Board of County Commissioners that it opposes any change to the Urban Development Boundary at this time, and urges Miami-Dade County to do the same, for the reasons outlined above. Section 2. The City of South Miami hereby advises Miami-Dade County and its Board of County Commissioners that it supports county policy that encourages infill development and adherence to the CDMP as currently adopted, including the adopted 2003 EAR, currently being drafted into code. Section 3. The City Clerk shall provide executed copies of this resolution to the Miami-Dade Mayor, each member of the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners, as well as each municipal City Clerk in Miami-Dade County for the purpose of distributing copies to members of their respective governing councils. Section 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2008. ATTEST: Z�ffY CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7=2 CITY EY 3 Page 2 of 2 APPROVED: 0 No Commission Vote: \ 1 5-0 Mayor Feliu: Yea Vice Mayor Beasley: Yea Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Commissioner Palmer: Yea Commissioner Beckman: Yea As you know, City of South Miami Passbd Resolution Number 38-06-1201'r in 2005 opposing movement of Miami-Dade's uFban development boundary (LUB). As you may be aware, three new applications seeklhg movement of the UDB will before the Miami:-Dade County Commission on A0.ril 241h for a final vote. We write today to ask for your -support ih providing written and oral cornme r ts to the Miami-Dade County, Commission on April 24" once again opposing move m-Dnt of the UDB and the exacerbation of sprawl. During our extensive outreach, thousands of residents within Mkami-D�ide County overwhelmingly recognized that it is premature 'to move the UD13, Disi.)inted approval of these applications to move the UDB willl raise costs and set precedenin, wh ch have immediate and long term consequences for quality of life throughout klianii-,lade. These costs are not mitigated by decoy !offers by developers and do not se- le the City of South Miami. It is the responsibility Of Miami-Drade County to implemej.1t th,e sound planning policies outlined in its comprehiensive plan and protect the existilicli community and the Everglades, Miami-Dade County planning staff, the South Florida Water Managem-c!nt 01;�trict, and the Department of Community Affairs (5,CA) have all strongly advised the (,:;()unty Commission that potable water supply i� not available to accommodat.- * the!; a applications. County staff and the DCA have repeatedly objected to a1:provH of these applications citing numerous inconsistencies With Miami-Dade's comp h.heri ive plan. Miami-Dade cannot implement water, school, and transportation conch renq-t needed to accommodate these projects. We would like the opportunity to have all ! in-person meeting or phone cl scu,,;!;lon with you or the appropriate staff person prior to the April 24'h Commission meefirill. We will be calling you soon to set up a convenieht time. In the interim, you can re:ioh me at (305) . 653-9101 or via e-mail dshirreffs . leanw-,42LOn. Sinl6erely yours, DaWn Shirreiffs South Florida Organizer 190 Ives Dairy Road E Suite 106 0 Miami, �L 33179 a (305) 1553.9101 a Farr,: (305) 653.9108 2002 5th Avenue a Suite 101 Tampa, �L 33605 a (813) 247.2150 M =ax; (8 13) 247.1868 www.CteahWaterA,i:tion.org SOLUTION NO. 3B-05-12017 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA, CALLING ON THE MIAMI -DADS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO OPPOSE ANY EXTENTION TO THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY AT THE PRESENT TIME, TO ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT AND ADHERENCE TO THE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT - MASTER PLAN AS CURRENTLY ADOPTED, INCLUDING THE ADOPTED 2003 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami recognize that The City South Miami is impacted significantly by Miami-Dade County's Planning, Zoning, and County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) policy; and, WHEREAS, the City of South Miami wishes to work with its sister municipalities and Miami-Dade County, in a regional manner, for fair, wise, and mutually beneficial policies; and, WHEREAS, the City of South Miami is aware that Miami-Dade County is under increasing pressure to extend the Urban Development Boundary (UDB) further south and west in order to allow greater, and sometimes intense, development activities to occur; and, WHEREAS, the City of South Miami is concerned that the proposed extension of the UDB will result in significant negative impacts for both the city and the entire region, including increased traffic; inadequately funded or unfiunded increased costs for the provision of potable water, waste water, storm water, schools, parks and open space; and county and municipal services, including, but not limited to police, fire, and social services; and, WHEREAS, the County's adopted 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) of the CDMP recommends against extending the UDB, and reports infill housing land to be in adequate supply through at least year 2020, which finding contradicts the need to extend the UDB at this time, and moreover, supports elimination of the current UDB expansion plan; and, WHEREAS, the city, like other municipalities within Miarni-Dade County, is currently engaged in its own state-mandated EAR; and Additions shown by undulinin and deletions shown by 9:vapstFild . Res. No. 38-05-12017 WHEREAS, the city and the other -municipalities should be provided adequate time to complete their state-mandated EAR processes prior to the County issuing a major expansion of the UDB or a major revision to the county's existing CDMP; and, WHEREAS, the South Miami-Dade Watershed Study and Plan, a comprehensive study underway jointly by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the South Florida Water Management District, and Miami-Dade County, will not be completed until late 2005, is intended to provide data essential to any consideration of moving the UDB or amending the CDMP, and should not be preempted; and, WHEREAS, Miami-Dade County is legally obligated to participate with state and federal efforts to restore the Greater Everglades Ecosystem, which could be significantly impacted if the UDB is moved, and proper analysis of those impacts has not been completed and should not be preempted; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission call upon Miami-Dade County to oppose any extension of the UDB at this time, and alternatively, call upon the County to adopt a policy encouraging infill development in accord with the existing adopted CDMP and EAR: OF INVOIJ M114101-JIMMAN, IWI&VIOMM 1011BUTIFIF-ALITH! my'* Section 1. The above-referenced whereas clauses are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. The City of South Miami hereby advises the Board of County Commissioners in and for Miami -Dade County that the city opposes any change to C� the Urban Development Boundary at this time, and urges Miami-Dade County to do the same, for the reasons outlined above. Section 3. The City of South Miami hereby advises Miami-Dade County and its Board of County Commissioners that it supports county policy that encourages infill development and adherence to the CDMP as currently adopted, including the adopted 2003 EAR, currently being drafted into code. Section 4. The City Clerk shall provide executed copies of this resolution to the Mayor of Miami-Dade County, each member of the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners, as well as each municipal City Clerk in Miami- Dade County for the purpose of distributing copies to members of their respective governing councils. Page 2 of 3 Res. No, 38-05-12017 Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon approval. PASSED A N D ADOPTED this day of 2j g4-, 2005 ATTEST: QY CLERY, APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: 7OFJ Commission Vote: 4-0 Mayor Russell: Yea Vice Mayor Palmer: absent Commissioner Wiscombe: Yea Comr-o-issioner Birts-Cooper: Yea Commissioner Sherar: Yea JAMy Docutnents\resolutions\RF-SOLUTION HOLD THE LINTE.Russell.doc Page 3 of 3