_Add on BTO:
FROM:
DATE:
City of South Miami
PUBLIC WORKS & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
4795 SW 75 th Avenue
Miami, FL 33155
Tel. (305) 663-6350 Fax (305) 668-7208
Steven Alexander, City Manager
Jorge L. Vera, Capital Improvement Project Manager
May21,2012
South Miami
hAd
;~fi.'
2001
Resolution: A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate hourly rates and to
execute a service agreement as provided under the Florida Statute 287.055
(Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act) "GGNA", for professional
services for the South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan (SMITP).
Background: On April 12, 2013, the City received 6 solicitations in response for the request for
qualifications RFQ #PW-S2013-10 for South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan. A
selection committee met to review and rank the firms in accordance with Florida Statute
287.055 (CCNA).
The intent of the CCNA is to select profel:!sional services based on the qualifications of the
firm, without considering the price of those services until after the firms have been ranked.
Ranking is based on qualifications and negotiations have begun with the top ranked firm.
Professional design services are defined under this law to include engineering, surveying &
mapping, landscape architecture, and architecture. Numerous studies have shown that
selection based on qualifications provides the owner with optimum services, whereas selection
based on low price only assures the owner of the least expensive initial design or study cost,
not necessarily the best or most cost-effective over the life of the project. Public agencies that
use qualifications based selection under the CCNA to procure engineering services are
better able to control construction costs and achieve a consistently high degree of project
satisfaction than those using other procurement methods. Therefore, the selection of firms
. wilLbGbCl$~\:L Ongl!(3UfjGgtiQn~alJc10J1~_~1irm~j'l[~§~leGl~g, Jh~r:LC::Qmp~Lti.\,I<2:I]~gQtj9!iQI}S .
for fees will occur.
Further, the intent of the CCNA legislation has always been to preclude "price consideration"
from entering into the selection process. The Florida Legislature clarified the statute in 1988 to
state that an "agency may request, accept, and consider proposals for the compensation to be
paid under the contract only during the competitive negotiation."
The execution of these Professional General Service :;lgreements does not commit the City
to any maximum amount of fees nor guarantees any work. Upon selection of the firms, the
City will negotiate hourly rates that are acceptable to the City and within industry standards.
Upon the City and firm negotiating a cost to perform the required scope for the South Miami
Intermodal Transportation Plan, a resolution will be brought before the City Commission for
approval the service agreement.
Attachments: Proposed Resolution
Evaluation selection sheets
1 RESOLUTION NO. ____ _
2
3 A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate hourly rates and to
4 execute a service agreement as provided under the Florida Statute 287.055
5 (Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act) "CCNA", for professional
6 services for the South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan (SMITP).
7 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desire to engage a firm that can provide
8 a complete scope of services with positive, dependable and accurate results to the eud users; and
9 WHEREAS, on April 12, 2013 a request for qualification RFQ #PW-S2013-10 was
10 released by the City for these studies; and
11 WHEREAS, the City received solicitation from six (6) firms; and
12 WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 287.055 (Consultant's Competitive
13 Negotiation Act) "CCNA", the City review committee conducted thorough review of the firms
14 qualifications, and overall evaluation and the firms were ranked in accordance to their
15 qualifications as follows with the highest rank at the top of the list:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
• Kimberly-Hom & Associates
• The Corradino Group
• Street Plans
• Calvin Giordano & Associates
• MC Harry & Associates
• Marlin Engineering
23 WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission desires to authorize the City Manager to
24 negotiate hourly rates and execute a service agreement with the highest ranked firm.
25
26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
27 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA:
28
29 Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to negotiate hourly rates and execute a
30 service agreement in the same form as published in RFQ #PW-S2013-10 in accordance with the
31 procedure set forth in Florida Statute 287.055 (Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act).
32
33 Section 2: The final agreement shall be approved by resolution prior to being signed by
34 the City Manager.
35
36 Section 3: If any section clause, sentence, or phrase of this resolution is for any reason
37 held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, the holding shall not affect
38 the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.
39
40 Section 2. This resolution shall be effective immediately upon being approved.
page 1
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ , day of ___ , 2013.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM,
LANGUAGE, LEGALITY AND
EXECUTION THEREOF
CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED:
MAYOR
COMMISSION VOTE:
Mayor Stoddard:
Vice Mayor Liebman:
Commissioner Newman:
Commissioner Harris:
Commissioner Welsh:
page 2
Evaluation Selection Committee Results
RFQ: South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan
Selection
Calvin,
Corradion MC Harry & Marlin
Committee
Giordano &
Group
Kimley Horn Assoc Engineering Street Plan
Assoc
C. Brimo 67 76 86 73 66 73
J. Korth 71 80 85 62 59 73
J. Vera 68 73 90 71 68 60
TOTAL 206 229 261 206 193 206
Ranking 3 2 1 3 6 3
Evaluation
Scoring Sheet
Purchasing Division
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida 33143
(305) 663-6339
Fax: (305) 667-7806
www.southmiamifl.gov
RFQ Title: South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan
RFQ No.: PW-S2013-10
DIRECTIONS: Please score each firm, for each specific criteria provided. Scoring is based on each criteria listed
below with a maximum score for each criteria. The total score for each proposer is calculated by adding each
criteria for a total score by proposer. The maximum score total score for each proposer is 100 points.
The ability of professional personnel,
including .the employees or principals of ~ A. the firm; subcontractors (If any) and, Z.1 '3 ~,... eJ6 "k,"'" pertinent training, skills, experience and
references. (Max. 40 poInts)
Firms proposed approach to provide the
/& Iq {~ (2. 17 B. services as described In the Scope of /z", Services. (Max. 20 points)
Respondent's willingness to meet City
/'6 c. timelines and budget requirements. /1 11 17 17 12-(Max. 20 poInts)
The recent, current, and projected 1 ,,-
7 D. workloads oftha firm. IMax.10 points) ~
Other factors authorized or requlred by
SectIon 287.055, Florida Statutes,
Incfuding the volume of work previously
awarded to the firm by the City, with the
object of effecting an equitable 7 E. distrlbuUon of contracts among qualified 7 7 7 7 firms, so long as the most highly
qualifled firms are selected. Firms that
have done prior business with the City
will not receive any preference In the
scoring and ranking. (Max. 10 points)
Reviewed by: Date:
(Print Name) 1'Slgnature)
Evaluation
Scoring Sheet
Purchasing Division
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida 33143
(305) 663-6339
Fax: (305) 667-7806
www.southmiamifl.gov
RFQ Title: South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan
RFQ No.: PW-S2013-10
DIRECTIONS: Please score each firm, for each specific criteria provided. Scoring is based on each criteria listed
below with a maximum score for each criteria. The total score for each proposer is calculated by adding each
criteria for a total score by proposer. The maximum score total score for each proposer is 100 points.
The ability of professional personnel,
!J;J?J 55 2-0 LS jo Including the employees or principals of 2& A. the finn; subcontractors (If any) and,
pertinent training, skills, experience and
references. (Max. 40 points)
Finns proposed approach to provide the \~ \~ l'6 1~ It{ l-=t B. services as described In the Scope of
Services. (Max. 20 points)
Respondent's willingness to meet City \1-\1-\<6 \ I \0 tq c. time lines and budget requirements.
(Max. 20 points)
D. The recent, current, and projected 9 5 wor1doads of the finn. (Mu.i0 points)
Other factors authorized or required by
Section 287.055, Florida Statutes,
Including the volume of wort< previously
awarded to the finn by the City, 'lAth the S object of effecting an equitable
E. distribution of contracts among qualified
IInns, so long as the most highly
qualified firms are selected. Finns that
have done prior business with the City
will not receive any preference In the
scoring and ranking. (Max. 10 pOints)
Reviewed by: ~1.arW\\~t( ~r<.:-tH
-(Print Name)
Evaluation
Scoring Sheet
Purchasing Division
6130 Sunset Drive
South Miami, Florida 33143
(305) 663~6339
Fax: (305) 667-7806
www.southmiamifl.gov
RFQ Title: South Miami Intermodal Transportation Plan
RFQ No.: PW-S2013-10
DIRECTIONS: Please score each firm, for each specific criteria provided. Scoring is based on each criteria listed
below with a maximum score for each criteria. The total score for each proposer is calculated by adding each
criteria for a total score by proposer. The maximum score total score for each proposer is 100 points.
The ability of professional personnel,
Including the employees or principals of 30 3S AD 32 3D 25 A. the flrm: subcontractors (if any) and,
pertinent training. skills, experience and
references. (Max. 40 points)
Arms proposed approach to provide the /5 18 20 /6 /'S' /2 B. services as described In the Scope of
Services. (Max. 20 points)
Respondent's willingness to meet City
']'0 8 14 { ( /2 10 c. IImelines and budget reqUirements.
(Max. 20 points)
D. The recent, current, and projected 5 7 5 g workloads of the firm. (Max. 10 poInts)
Other factors authorized or required by
SectIon 287.055, Florida Statutes,
includIng the volume of work previously
7 7 awarded to the firm by the City, with the 7 object of effecting an equitable
E. dIstribution of contracts among qualified
firms, so long as the most highly
qualified firms are selected. Firms that
have done prior business with the City
will not receive any preference In the
scoring and ranking. (Max. 10 points)
Additional Comments:
Reviewed by: Date:
I (Print Name)