Loading...
26CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor Stoddard and Members of the City Commission Via: Hector Mirabile, Ph.D., City Manage 000 From: Thomas J. Vageline, Director South Miami Ae•AmeticecilN 2001 Planning and Zoning Department ' Date: September 21, 2010 ITEM No. gad W Subject An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending the Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts" by transferring all provisions related to two story single family structures to existing Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions "; and making technical adjustments to Section 20- 3.5(H); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. BACKGROUND On 2007, the Planning and Zoning Department conducted a series of workshops and studies to review and analyze architectural design of two -story single family structures within the City of South Miami residential zoning districts. One of the issues closely studied was the massing of the second floor in relation to the first floor on two -story single family structures on the existing character of the neighborhoods. This analysis included all five single - family districts, RS -1, RS -2, RS -3, RS -4 and RS -5. As a result, this process lead to Ordinance number 27 -07 -1928, which was passed and adopted on September 4, 2007, with a Commission vote of 5 -0. The adopted change resulted in more restrictive design guidelines and dimensional requirements for new two -story single - family structures and two -story additions throughout the City of South Miami, specifically all five single - family residential districts. These are found in Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions ". Prior to the adoption of Ordinance number 27 -07 -1928, in September 2007, the Land Development Code regulated design guidelines and dimensional requirement for both one -story and two -story design in Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts ". 2 CURRENT LDC REGULATIONS The Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts ", which regulates dimensional standards for both one -story and two -story single family districts and must be consistent with Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two - story additions ", was added to the Land Development Code at a later date. In order to avoid a potential design conflict, provide consistency within the Code, and have a clear distinction as to the dimensional requirements between a one -story and a two -story single - family residential design regulations, minor revisions are being proposed to Sec. 20 -3.5 (A), (C), (E) and (H), as shown on the attached draft ordinance. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board at its July 13, 2010 meeting after public hearing adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes and 1 nay recommending the approval of the proposed text amendments. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the proposed amendments be approved. Attachments: Planning Dept. Staff report 7 -13 -10 (PB -10 -012) (including Ordinance No. 27 -07 -1928) Planning Board Excerpt Minutes 7 -13 -10 (PB -10 -012) Public Notices Draft ordinance TN /LCH YAComm Items\2010 \9- 21- 10\LDC Text Amend Two -story Single- Family\LDC Text Amend.doc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ORDINANCE NO. An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending the Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts" by transferring all provisions related to two story single family structures to existing Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions "; and making technical adjustments to Section 20- 3.5(H); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. WHEREAS, In 2007 the Planning and Zoning Department conducted several workshops to review and analyze architectural design of two -story single family structures within the City of South Miami residential zoning use districts; and WHEREAS, this process lead to Ordinance No. 27 -07 -1928 passed and adopted by the City Commission on September 4, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Land Development Code, Section 20- 3.5(H) regulates the adopted changes from Ordinance No. 27 -07 -1928 for New Two -Story Single- Family Structures and Two -Story Additions; and WHEREAS, currently the Land Development Code, Section 20- 3.5(E) regulates Dimensional Standards for both One -Story and Two -Story design single - family districts, both in one table; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department has prepared an amendment to the Land Development Code in order to clarify and clearly distinguish between the regulating sections and tables of the Land Development Code for the Single- Family Residential Districts, One -Story and the Single - Family Residential Districts, Two - Story; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board at its July 13, 2010 meeting adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes 1 nay recommending approval of the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board and enact the aforesaid amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Section 20 -3.5 entitled "Dimensional requirements" is hereby amended as listed below: Section 20 -3.5 Dimensional requirements. 3 (A) Residential Districts. In residential districts, the maximum density, 4 minimum lot area and frontage, minimum yard setbacks, maximum coverage and 5 maximum building heights for the permitted uses in each district shall be 6 determined from the Dimensional Requirements Table for either single - family 7 residential districts one -story (Section 20- 3.5(E)) or single - family residential 8 districts two -story (Section 20- 3.5(H) or multi- family districts (Section 20- 9 3.5fF)). 10 11 (B) Nonresidential Districts. In nonresidential districts, the minimum lot 12 area and frontage, minimum yard setbacks, maximum floor area, maximum 13 coverage and maximum building heights for permitted uses in each district shall be 14 determined from the Dimensional Requirements Table for nonresidential districts 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 (Section 20- 3.5iG )). (C) Dimensional Requirement Tables. (1) The use of land and the erection of buildings and other structures on land shall be subject to the dimensional requirements of the applicable zoning district, as reflected on the three four tables labeled "Dimensional Requirements, Single- Family Residential Districts, One -Story" (Section 20- 3.5(E)) or "Dimensional Requirements, Single- Family Residential Districts, Two -Story" (Section 20- 3.5(H): l, "Dimensional Requirements, Multi - family Districts" (Section 20- 3.5JFZ) and "Dimensional Requirements, Nonresidential Districts" (Section 20- 3.5,(G)). (2) There shall be no variation or deviation from such dimensional requirements except where expressly allowed by this Code. (3) Minimum and maximum dimensional requirements for permitted uses within a PR or PI use district shall be the same as those listed in the following tables for uses within the most restrictive use district located adjacent to the subject PR or PI property. (D) Properties Abutting Single - Family Zoning Districts. (1) Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements of the zoning use district in which a property is located, if that property is abutting (common border or separated by a right -of -way) to a single - family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any vertical addition to an existing building on that property is limited to two stories, however, additional height may be obtained via the special use permit process as set forth in Section 20 -5.8. (2) Properties or projects constructed under a city approved Planned Unit Development Site Plan or projects subject to Development Agreements during the period that the Agreement is in effect, shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. In no case shall a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 9 project be rebuilt which exceeds the height, setback or density that was set forth in the Development Agreement or applicable Planned Unit Development Site Plan. (3) Properties presently existing and actually built on the effective date of this ordinance shall be grandfathered in and exempted from the provisions of this section and allowed to be rebuilt to the same height if they are destroyed by an act of God or other natural disaster. Section 20 -3.5E DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - ONE -STORY REQUIREMENT Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) Frontage (ft.) Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front Rear Side (Interior). Fns less in heigh� fiFst fleof fins he �10BFE{QY3EIBR 6 Nftieae€ structure above 12' high- as_mQasured fiem the first floe !'..'.hed fl....: elevatiea Side (Street) Max. Building Height Stefies Feet Max. Building Coverage ( %) First floor first }�rrv- azi rmrfl AOF Max. Impervious Coverage ( %) RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 40,000 15,000 1.0,000 6,000 6,000 125 100 75 60 50 50 35 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 12.5 10 7.5 75b 7.5b 20 15 15 15 15 25 25 25 25 25 20 30 30 30 60 30 60 60 30 60 40 60 40 45 45 a Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 Section 20 -3.5H DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - TWO -STORY REQUIREMENT RS -I RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) 40,000 15,000 10.000 6_,000 6,6,000 Frontage (ft.) 125 100 75 60 50 Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front 50 35 25 25 25 Rear 25 25 25 25 25 Side (Interior). For structure 12' or Refer to Table 1 less in height, as measured from the first floor finished floor elevation Portion of structure above 12' high as measured from the first floor finished floor elevation Side (Street) Max. Building Heieht Stories - - - Feet Max. Building Coverage ( %) First floor Max. Impervious Coverage ( %) Max. Floor Area Ratio ( %) Second floor Refer to Table 1 20 is 15 15 15 2 2 2 2 2 25 25 25 55 25 Refer to Table Z Refer to Table 2 Refer to Table 2 a Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. (I4) Special dimensional requirements and performance standards for two -story single family structure and two story additions. (A) Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish special dimensional requirements and performance standards to regulate two -story single family structures and two -story additions within the residential zoning districts_ "RS -1" Estate Residential "RS -2" Semi - Estate City of South Miami. (S) Applicability. The requirements of this Section shall be in addition to each and every other requirement of the City of South Miami Land Development Code (Code), and in the case of conflict, the provision of this Section shall control. (C) Performance Standards. The performance standard set forth in this section will guide the development of two -story residential homes in the single family residential districts_ R 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 and RS -5. The performance standards are necessary in order to address yard setbacks, open space, adequate landscaping, plan review process, and existing character of the residential neighborhoods in the City of South Miami. By implementing these standards the city will be able to preserve and enhance the neighborhood character through architectural designs that are consistent and responsive to the individual context of the city architecturally diverse neighborhoods. (1) Building Site. The development of two -story residential homes shall be constructed on a lot that is suitable for residential development, provides adequate setbacks and the necessary infrastructure to support the development. (2) Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size for residential homes shall be subject to the dimensional requirements set forth in the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Residential District Two Story" Section 20- 3.5 . (Seet 2.0 .S E ). For irregular shaped lots, the average lot width rather than the frontage width shall be used at the discretion of the Planning Director. WIN (4) Yard Setback Requirements. No building or structure, or any part thereof, including covered porches or terraces, but not including uncovered steps, projections shall be erected at a lesser distance from the front, side or rear line of any building site than the front, side or rear setback distance, respectively, prescribed and established herein for such building site. Nothing herein shall prohibit a building or structure from having more than the minimum required setbacks. (a) Side Setbacks (Interior). Refer to Table 1: "Proposed Preliminary Minimum Side Yard Setbacks." Side yards shall be measured from the closest point of the structure's vertical outside wall to the side lot line, on a bearing parallel to the front lot line, at ground level. TABLE 1 New Two -Story Single Family Residential and Second Story Additions Minimum Setbacks Requirements (Interior Lot) Existing Lot Frontage (ft. 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-+ First Floor Interior Side Setback a 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.0 Second Floor Interior Side Setback b 7.5 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 1 2 a Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where 3 any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. 4 5 b For pre - existing improved lots of record in the RS3 or RS4 districts that are 50 feet or 6 less in lot width the second floor setback shall be the same as the first floor setback. 7 8 9 (b) Front Setback. The minimum front setback shall be consistent with the dimensional 10 requirements reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional 11 Requirements Single - Family Residential District Two Story" (Section 20- 3.5(1-1)). 12 (Seetien 20 I.Iffill- 13 14 (c) Side Setbacks (Street). The minimum side setback (street) for structure that abuts a 15 street shall be consistent with the dimensional requirements reflected on the Land 16 Development Code table labeled 'Dimensional Requirements Single - Family 17 Residential District Two Story" (Section 20- 3.5(f1)). (Seetien 20 18 19 (d) Rear Setback. The minimum rear setback of twenty -five (25) feet shall be maintained 20 and required on principle buildings in the single - family residential district, as 21 reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled 'Dimensional Requirements 22 Single- Family Residential District Two Story" (Section 20- 3.5(M). (C^ 2-0- 23 1 G 24 25 (4) �3 Building Height Limit. No single - family residential home shall be built in the City of 26 South Miami that is more than two- stories in height. The maximum building height for 27 two -story homes shall not exceed twenty -five (25) feet. 28 29 30 J�j Maximum Building Coverage. The maximum building coverage permitted for a two - 31 story single family residence shall be determined for for each application by using 32 the dimensional requirements set forth in Table 2, Section (C)12, Development 33 Standards. 34 35 (6) Maximum Impervious Coverage The maximum impervious coverage permitted for a 36 two -story single - family residence shall be determined for each application by using 37 the dimensional requirements set forth in Table 2, Section (C)12, Development 38 Standards. 39 40 (7) Maximum Floor Area Ratio. The maximum floor area ratio permitted for a two -story 41 single - family residence shall be determined for each application by using the 42 dimensional requirements set forth in Table 2, Section (012, Development 43 Standards. 44 45 46 impervious eeverage shall be detefmined fer each applioatien by using the dinieftsiona 47 fequirements set fefth in on. 4 . 48 49 (8) (7) Landscape Requirements. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the entire front yard area 50 shall be green space. All yard areas shall be landscaped with trees and drought resistant 51 native vegetation, as necessary, to enhance privacy from abutting properties. The I landscaped open space required by this Section shall consist of pervious landscaped area 2 and shall not consist of any paved or otherwise impervious areas. The minimum height of 3 new trees for two -story homes shall be eighteen (18) feet. An inventory of existing trees 4 located onsite shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department as part of the 5 Environmental Review Preservation Board (ERPB) application. The required landscaped 6 plan shall be prepared by Florida Registered Landscape Architect consistent with the City's 7 Tree Ordinance. 8 9 M-(8) Architectural and Site Plan Review. All new two -story homes or second story additions 10 shall be reviewed by the ERPB consistent with Section 20- 6.1(C) of the Land 11 Development Code. The design review must be based on sound and clearly articulated 12 design principles. The architectural plans must be signed and sealed by a Florida 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Registered Architect. (a) The ERPB shall consider and apply the following features as part of the review: (i) Scale, color, texture, appropriateness, and aesthetic quality of all proposed buildings and other structures; (ii) Quantity, quality and arrangement of all proposed landscaping and open space features; (iii) Overall compatibility of the proposed development with the existing and desired character of the property and neighborhood in which located; and (iv) The installation of sidewalks along all arterial roadways and compliance with the City's sidewalk policies and requirements. (b) Designs should use a mix of articulation, architectural elements and exterior finishes reducing the perceived scale and bulk of buildings, including low to moderately pitched roofs and recesses under roof creating indoor /out door living spaces (terraces). In considering the design of the building, the ERPB shall consider and apply Section 7(a)(i) thru (iii), and render a decision as to the adequacy of the elements in the design concept including, but not limited to: Trim Shutters Awnings and canopies Windows (Fenestration) Doors Texture of surface Colors Roofs (materials, color, slope and overhang) Planters Window boxes Walls, height, location, materials, design Height of building Location of structure on site Site circulation in regard to pedestrian travel, parking, services, grades and landscaping Location of exposed piping, conduits and rain water leaders The impact on adjacent properties of continuous two story walls I All lighting (height, location and style) 2 4 (c) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 A Comprehensive Neighborhood Analysis, photographs of the site, and a statement explaining how the proposed building complies with the architectural style surrounding the site must be submitted as part of the ERPB application. The ERPB shall require changes to the plans to ensure that the design preserves the existing architectural style of the neighborhood, unless specified to the contrary, and promotes design excellence in the community. The ERPB, as part of the its application for review, shall require the submission of photographs of both sides of the street and all abutting properties, on the block where the new two -story home or two -story addition is to be constructed. (d) The architectural context includes the height, scale, massing, separation between buildings, and style in regard to how buildings and structures relate to each other within a specified area. Architectural context allows for differences in height, scale, massing, and separation between buildings and style, when such differences contribute to the overall harmony and character of the area. The ERPB shall not take into consideration existing buildings and structure that are out of context with the area when considering whether a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is in context with both sides of the street on the block where it is located and surrounding properties. The ERPB shall review the building or structure in the context of that area in which the site is located when a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is located on a building site that is on the border of two areas that have different character or content. (e) The Planning Director shall have the administrative discretion to require the above review process to be accomplished prior to a Planning Board public hearing on the proposed development application. (9)Findings. The ERPB shall determine approval or disapproval of the proposed designed plans. The Board shall prepare a written determination in order to state the intent of its decision. The written determination shall be filed with the Planning Department for inclusion in the project record. (ll) (()Historic Preservation Board Review. Construction of a two -story home or a second story additions or alterations to existing homes in the City's Historic District shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board and ERPB. The Historic Preservation Board shall review the application for consistency with the City's historic preservation guidelines, requirements set forth in this section, and the standards for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness set forth in the Land Development Code. The Board shall also determine compatibility with the guidelines in the specific Historic Designation Report. The Historic Preservation Board recommendations shall be submitted to the ERPB for consideration. The ERPB shall give consideration to the findings of the Historic Preservation Board as part of its review for the purpose of determining consistency with the requirements set forth in this section. (14)- Development Standards. The development standards are based on percentage of lot size consistent with the table provided below. The lot size that does not exactly match table 2 shall be rounded -o€€ up to the next highest lot size in order to determine the appropriate lot size. 2 TABLE 2 3 New Two -Story Single - Family Residential and Second Story Additions 4 Percentage. Requirements for Maximum Building Coverage, 5 Impervious Coverage and FAR 6 7 Lot Size Maximum Building Maximum Impervious Maximum Floor 8 Coverage Coverage Area Ratio 9 5,000 0.300 0.450 0.550 10 6,000 0.300 0.450 0.525 11 7,000 0.300 0.438 0.500 12 8,000 0.300 0.425 0.475 13 .9,000 0.300 0.413 0.450 14 10,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 15 11,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 16 12,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 17 13,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 18 14,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 19 15.000 0.300 0.400 0.450 20 16,000 0.296 0.396 0.444 21 17,000 0.292 0.392 0.438 22 18,000 0288 0.388 0.432 23 19,000 0.284 0.384 0.426 24 20,000 0.280 0.380 0.420 25 21,000 0.276 0.376 0.414 26 22,000 0.272 0.372 0.408 27 23,000 0.268 0.368 0.402 28 24,000 0.264 0364 0.396 29 25,000 0.260 0360 0.390 30 26,000 0256 0.356 0.384 31 27,000 0.252 0.352 0.378 32 28,000 0.248 0.348 0.372 33 29,000 0.244 0.344 0.366 34 30,000 0.240 0.340 0.360 35 31,000 0.236 0.336 0.354 36 32,000 0.232 0.332 0348 37 33,000 0.228 0.328 0.342 38 34,000 0224 0.324 0.336 39 35,000 0.220 0.320 0.330 40 36,000 0.216 0.316 0.324 41 37,000 0.212 0.312 0.318 42 38,000 0.208 0.308 0.312 43 39,000 0.204 0.304 0.306 44 40,000+ 0.200 0.300 0.300 45 46 (Ord. No. 2 -90 -1445, 1 -2 -90; Ord. No. 2 -92 -1497, 1 -7 -92; Ord. No. 13 -93 -1541, § 1, 9- 17 -93; Ord. 47 No. 23 -94- 48 1573, § 1, 12- 20 -94; Ord. No. 8 -95 -1581, § 3, 6 -6 -95; Ord. No. 1 -96 -1601, § 1, 1- 16 -96; Ord. No. 49 8 -97 -1629, § 50 1, 4 -1 -97; Ord. No. 17- 03- 1801A, § 1, 9 -2 -03; Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928, § 2, 9 -4 -07) 51 52 53 Section 2. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any 54 reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding 55 shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. 56 57 Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ATTEST: CITY CLERK 1St Reading — 2nd Reading — READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUFFICIENCY: CITY ATTORNEY 10 day of 2010 APPROVED: MAYOR COMMISSION VOTE: Mayor Stoddard: Vice Mayor Newman: Commissioner Palmer: Commissioner Beasley: Commissioner Harris: (New wording in bold and underlined,- wording removed in soh) Z:1Comm 1tems12 01 019- 2 1- 1 01LDC Text Amend Two -story Single- FamilylLDC Amend Two -story Ordinance numbered.doe To: Honorable Chair and Planning Board Members From: Thomas J. Vageline. Director Planning and Zoning Departme 001� Date: July 13, 2010 Re: LDC Text Amendment Two -Story Single Family Structure Sec. 20- 3.5(E) and Sec. 20- 3.5(H) PB -10 -012 Applicant: City of South Miami An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending the Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts" by transferring all provisions related to two story single family structures to existing Section 20- 3.5(11), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions "; and making technical adjustments to Section 20- 3.5(H); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. BACKGROUND On 2007, the Planning and Zoning Department conducted a series of workshops and studies to review and analyze architectural design of two -story single family structures within the City of South Miami residential zoning districts. One of the issues closely studied was the massing of the second floor in relation to the first floor on two -story single- family structures on the existing character of the neighborhoods. This analysis included all five single- family districts, RS -1, RS -2, RS -3, RS -4 and RS -5. As a result, this process lead to Ordinance number 27 -07 -1928, which was passed and adopted on September 4, 2007, with a Commission vote of 5 -0. The change adopted resulted in more restrictive design guidelines and dimensional requirements for new two -story single - family structures and two -story additions throughout the City of South Miami, specifically all five single - family residential districts. These are found in Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions ". Prior to the adoption of Ordinance number 27 -07 -1928, in September 2007, the Land Development Code regulated design guidelines and dimensional requirement for both one -story and two -story design in Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts ". LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 2 CURRENT LDC REGULATIONS The Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts ", which regulates dimensional standards for both one -story and two - story design single family districts and must be consistent with Section 20- 3.5(Id), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions ", added to the Land Development Code at a later date. In order to avoid a potential design conflict, provide consistency within the Code, and have a clear distinction as to the dimensional requirements between a one -story and a two -story single - family residential design regulations, minor revisions are being proposed to See. 20 -3.5 (A), (C), (E) and (H), as shown on the attached pages. The corrections removed are being shown as deleted (`4ke -t gh) and the new wording is shown in bold underlined. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the proposed amendments be approved. Attachments: ordinance No. 27 -07 -1928 Public Notices TJV /LCH Y:\PB \PB Agendas Staff Reports\2010 Agendas Staff Reports \7- 13- 10\PB -10 -012 LDC Amend Two -Story Single- Family Correction.doc LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 LDC PROPOSED AMENDMENT (new wording shown in boGUunderlined; wording to be removed shown in- sirike- through) Section 20 -3.5 Dimensional requirements. (A) Residential Districts. In residential districts, the maximum density, minimum lot area and frontage, minimum yard setbacks, maximum coverage and maximum building heights for the permitted uses in each district shall be determined from the Dimensional Requirements Table for either single - family residential districts one -story (Section 20- 3.5(E)) or single- family residential districts two -story (Section 20- 3.5 I3 )) or multi - family districts (Section 20- 3.5jFI). (B) Nonresidential Districts. In nonresidential districts, the minimum lot area and frontage, minimum yard setbacks, maximum floor area, maximum coverage and maximum building heights for permitted uses in each district shall be determined from the Dimensional Requirements Table for nonresidential districts (Section 20- 3.5fG)). (C) Dimensional Requirement Tables. (1) The use of land and the erection of buildings and other structures on land shall be subject to the dimensional requirements of the applicable zoning district, as reflected on the three four tables labeled "Dimensional Requirements, Single - Family Residential Districts, One- Story" (Section 20- 3.5JEh or "Dimensional Requirements Single- Family "Dimensional Requirements, 1 20- 3.5,(F)) and "Dimensional Districts" (Section 20- 3.5fGj). ulti- family Districts" (Section Requirements, Nonresidential (2) There shall be no variation or deviation from such dimensional requirements except where expressly allowed by this Code. (3) Minimum and maximum dimensional requirements for permitted uses within a PR or PI use district shall be the same as those listed in the following tables for uses within the most restrictive use district located adjacent to the subject PR or PI property. LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 (D) Properties Abutting Single - Family Zoning Districts. (1) Notwithstanding the dimensional requirements of the zoning use district in which a property is located, if that property is abutting (common border or separated by a right-of-way) to a single - family zoning district the maximum height of any new building or any vertical addition to an existing building on that property is limited to two stories, however, additional height may be obtained via the special use permit process as set forth in Section 20 -5.8. (2) Properties or projects constructed under a city approved Planned Unit Development Site Plan or projects subject to Development Agreements during the period that the Agreement is in effect, shall not be subject to the provisions of this section. In no case shall a project be rebuilt which exceeds the height, setback or density that was set forth in the Development Agreement or applicable Planned Unit Development Site Plan. (3) Properties presently existing and actually built on the effective date of this ordinance shall be grandfathered in and exempted from the provisions of this section and allowed to be rebuilt to the same height if they are destroyed by an act of God or other natural disaster. LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 5 Section 20 -3.5E DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - ONE -STORY REQUIREMENT Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) Frontage (ft.) Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front Rear Side (Interior)e Feestwcture -i2' ee wgs'.. 6..:..6�. .. f� ✓a'n'rncJrbn � a measured- tfOfn-the fifst [fliwo �i nioi'�' €bet - elevation geRien -e€ v �o� S�kM1if�f {^• ^_vr� -nowt h.�­measm,ed kem- ihe4if& -Reef f ndshv'vneer elevation RS -I RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 40,000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 125 100 75 60 50 50 35 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 12.5 10 7.5 7.5b 7.5b -=3- 20 15e 18e— ;3 Side (Street) 20 15 15 is 15 Max. Building Height Stories- 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max. Building Coverage ( %) First floor 20 30 30 30 30 Seeond4leer: % e€ the_f+rst-Aoef 60 60 68 60—`0^ Max. Impervious Coverage ( %) 30 40 40 45 45 a Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. b Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the building already has a 5 feet setback. s_ > less in let width, LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 Section 20 -3.5H DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - TWO -STORY REOUIREMENT RS -I RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 RS -5 Min. Lot Size Net Area (sq. ft.) 40000 15,000 10,000 6,000 6_,000 Frontage (ft.) 125 100 75 60 50 Min. Yard Setbacks (ft.) Front SO 35 25 25 25 Rear 25 25 25 25 25 Side (Interior), For structure 12' or Refer to Table 1 less in height, as measured from the first floor finished floor elevation Portion of Refer to Table T structure above 12' high as measured from the first Boor finished floor elevation Side (Street) 20 15 15 15 15 Max. Building Ifeight Stories 2 2 2 2 2 Feet 25 25 25 25 25 Max Building Coverage ( %) First floor Refer to Table 2 Max Impervious Coverage M) Refer to Table 2 Max. Floor Area Ratio ( %) Second floor Refer to Table 2 a _Cumulative width of both side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. (14) Special dimensional requirements and performance standards for two -story single family structure and two story additions. (A) Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish special dimensional requirements and performance standards to regulate two -story single family structures and two -story additions within the residential zoning districts; "RS -1" Estate Residential "RS -2" Semi - Estate Residential "RS -3" Low Density Single - Family Residential "RS -4" Single- Family. Residential and "RS -5" Single - Family Residential (50' lots) of the City of South Miami. (B) Applicability. The requirements of this Section shall be in addition to each and every other requirement of the City of South Miami Land Development Code (Code), and in the case of conflict, the provision of this Section shall control. LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 7 (C) Performance Standards. The performance standard set forth in this section will guide the development of two -story residential homes in the single family residential districts: RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS -4 and RS -5. The performance standards are necessary in order to address yard setbacks, open space, adequate landscaping, plan review process, and existing character of the residential neighborhoods in the City of South Miami. By implementing these standards the city will be able to preserve and enhance the neighborhood character through architectural designs that are consistent and responsive to the individual context of the city architecturally diverse neighborhoods. (1) Building Site. The development of two -story residential homes shall be constructed on a lot that is suitable for residential development, provides adequate setbacks and the necessary infrastructure to support the development. (2) Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size for residential homes shall be subject to the dimensional requirements set forth in the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Residential District Two Story" Section 20- 3.5(H). (c�den - -2 _�(= For irregular shaped lots, the average lot width rather than the frontage width shall be used at the discretion of the Planning Director. P n, r , , he r . go�,rmiiied fe of thp build ing (4) Yard Setback Requirements. No building or structure, or any part thereof, including covered porches or terraces, but not including uncovered steps, projections shall be erected at a lesser distance from the front, side or rear line of any building site than the front, side or rear setback distance, respectively, prescribed and established herein for such building site. Nothing herein shall prohibit a building or structure from having more than the minimum required setbacks. (a) Side Setbacks (Interior). Refer to Table 1: "Proposed Preliminary Minimum Side Yard Setbacks." Side yards shall be measured from the closest point of the structure's vertical outside wall to the side lot line, on a bearing parallel to the front lot line, at i cw a .a H i� t for ground level. t'-' -- 'pent- ef�otal -lth , LDC Aniendnient July 13, 2010 TABLE I New Two -Story Single Family Residential and Second Story Additions Minimum Setbacks Requirements (Interior Lot) Existing Lot Frontage (ft.l SId &4FAeii0E- �i4lh 40 -44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-+ First Floor Interior Side Setback a 7.5 7.5 7.5 T5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.0 Second Floor Interior Side Setback b 7.5 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 a Except that additions to existing structures may have 5 feet interior side setbacks where any portion of the buildin>? already has a 5 feet setback. b floor setback. (b) Front Setback. The minimum front setback shall be consistent with the dimensional requirements reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single- Family Residential District Two Std" (Section 20- 3.5(H)). (c) Side Setbacks (Street). The minimum side setback (street) for structure that abuts a street shall be consistent with the dimensional requirements reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single- Family Residential District Two Story" (Section 20- 3.5(H)). VRZ�'T.J (d) .Rear Setback. The minimum rear setback of twenty -five (25) feet shall be maintained and required on principle buildings in the single - family residential district, as reflected on the Land. Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single- Family Residential District Two Storv" (Section.20- 3.5(H)). (Seet-i "'n W. (4) (3) Building Height Limit. No single- family residential home shall be built in the City of South Miami that is more than two- stories in height. The maximum building height for two -story homes shall not exceed twenty -five (25) feet. LDC Ainendment July 13, 2010 Maximum Building Coverage The maximum building coverage permitted for a two -story single family residence shall be determined for for each application by using the dimensional requirements set forth in Table 2, Section (C)12 Development Standards. Maximum Impervious Coverage The maximum impervious coverage permitted for a two -story single- family residence shall be determined for each application by using the dimensional requirements set forth m Table 2, Section (C)12 Development Standards. Maximum Floor Area Ratio The maximum floor area ratio permitted for ,.a Development Standards. Malkz. (7) Landscape Requirements. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the entire front yard area shall be green space. All yard areas shall be landscaped with trees and drought resistant native vegetation, as necessary, to enhance privacy from abutting properties. The landscaped open space required by this Section shall consist of pervious landscaped area and shall not consist of any paved or otherwise impervious areas. The minimum height of new trees for two -story homes shall be eighteen (18) feet. An inventory of existing trees located onsite shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department as part of the Environmental Review Preservation Board (ERPB) application. The required landscaped plan shall be prepared by Florida Registered Landscape Architect consistent with the City's Tree Ordinance. M-($) Architectural and Site Plan Review. All new two -story homes or second story additions shall be reviewed by the ERPB consistent with Section 20- 6.1(C) of the Land Development Code. The design review must be based on sound and clearly articulated design principles. The architectural plans must be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Architect. (a) The ERPB shall consider and apply the following features as part of the review: (i) Scale, color, texture, appropriateness, and aesthetic quality of all proposed buildings and other structures; (ii) Quantity, quality and arrangement of all proposed landscaping and open space features; LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 10 (iii) Overall compatibility of the proposed development with the existing and desired character of the property and neighborhood in which located; and (iv) The installation of sidewalks along all arterial roadways and compliance with the City's sidewalk policies and requirements. (b) Designs should use a mix of articulation, architectural elements and exterior finishes reducing the perceived scale and bulk of buildings, including low to moderately pitched roofs and recesses under roof creating indoor /out door living spaces (terraces). In considering the design of the building, the ERPB shall consider and apply Section 7(a)(i) thru (iii), and render a decision as to the adequacy of the elements in the design concept including, but not limited to: Trim Shutters Awnings and canopies Windows (Fenestration) Doors Texture of surface Colors Roofs (materials, color, slope and overhang) Planters Window boxes Walls, height, location, materials, design Height of building Location of structure on site Site circulation in regard to pedestrian travel, parking, services, grades and landscaping Location of exposed piping, conduits and rain water leaders The impact on adjacent properties of continuous two story walls All lighting (height, location and style) (c) A Comprehensive Neighborhood Analysis, photographs of the site, and a statement explaining how the proposed building complies with the architectural style surrounding the site must be submitted as part of the ERPB application. The ERPB shall require changes to the plans to ensure that the design preserves the existing architectural style of the neighborhood, unless specified to the contrary, and promotes design excellence in the community. The ERPB, as part of the its application for review, shall require the submission of photographs of both sides of the street and all abutting properties, on the block where the new two -story home or two -story addition is to be constructed. LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 11 (d) The architectural context includes the height, scale, niassing, separation between buildings, and style in regard to how buildings and structures relate to each other within a specified area. Architectural context allows for differences in height, scale, massing, and separation between buildings and style, when such differences contribute to the overall harmony and character of the area. The ERPB shall not take into consideration existing buildings and structure that are out of context with the area when considering whether a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is in context with both sides of the street on the block where it is located and surrounding properties. The ERPB shall review the building or structure in the context of that area in which the site is located when a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is located on a building site that is on the border of two areas that have different character or content. (e) The Planning Director shall have the administrative discretion to require the above review process to be accomplished prior to a Planning Board public hearing on the proposed development application. (Findings. The ERPB shall determine approval or disapproval of the proposed designed plans. The Board shall prepare a written determination in order to state the intent of its decision. The written determination shall be filed with the Planning Department for inclusion in the project record. 11 (1- 9)Historic Preservation Board Review. Construction of a two -story home or a second story additions or alterations to existing homes in the City's Historic District shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board and ERPB. The Historic Preservation Board shall review the application for consistency with the City's historic preservation guidelines, requirements set forth in this section, and the standards for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness set forth in the Land Development Code. The Board shall also determine compatibility with the guidelines in the specific Historic Designation Report. The Historic Preservation Board recommendations shall be submitted to the ERPB for consideration. The ERPB shall give consideration to the findings of the Historic Preservation Board as part of its review for the purpose of determining consistency with the requirements set forth in this section. (14)- Development Standards. The development standards are based on percentage of lot size consistent with the table provided below. The lot size that does not exactly match table 2 shall be rounded -off up to the next highest lot size in order to determine the appropriate lot size. LDC Amendment July 13, 2010 12 (Ord. No. 2 -90 -1445, 1 -2 -90; Ord. No. 2 -92 -1497, 1 -7 -92; Ord. No. 13 -93 -1541, § 1, 9- 17-93; Ord. No. 23 -94- 1573, § 1, 12- 20 -94; Ord. No. 8 -95 -1581, § 3, 6 -6 -95; Ord. No. 1 -96 -1601, § 1, 1- 16 -96; Ord. No. 8 -97 -1629, § 1, 4 -1 -97; Ord. No. 17- 03- 1801A, § 1, 9 -2 -03; Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928, § 2, 9 -4 -07) TABLE 2 New Two -Story Single- Family Residential and Second Story Additions Percentage Requirements for Maximum Building Coverage, Impervious Coverage and FAR Lot Size Maximum Building Maximum impervious Maximum Floor Coverage Coverage Area Ratio 5,000 0.300 0.450 0.550 6,000 0.300 0.450 0525 7,000 0.300 0.438 0.500 8,000 0.300 0.425 0.475 9,000 0300 0.413 0.450 10,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 11,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 12,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 13,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 14,000 0.300. - 0.400 0.450 15,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 16,000 0.296 0.396 0.444 17,000 0.292 0.392 0.438 18,000 0.288 0.388 0.432 19,000 0284 0.384 0.426 20,000 0.280 0.380 0.420 21,000 0.276 0.376 0.414 22,000 0.272 0.372 0.408 23,000 0.268 0.368 0.402 24,000 0.264 0364 0.396 25,000 0.260 0.360 0.390 26,000 0.256 0.356 0.384 27,000 0.252 0.352 0378 28,000 0.248 0.348 0.372 29,000 0.244 0.344 0.366 30,000 0.240 0.340 0.360 31,000 0,236 0.336 0.354 32,000 0232 0.332 0.348 33,000 0.228 0.328 0.342 34,000 0.224 0.324 0.336 35,000 0.220 0.320 0.330 36,000 0.216 0.316 0.324 37,000 0.212 0.312 0.318 38,000 0.208 0.308 0.312 39,000 0.204 0.304 0.306 40,000+ 0.200 0.300 0.300 (Ord. No. 2 -90 -1445, 1 -2 -90; Ord. No. 2 -92 -1497, 1 -7 -92; Ord. No. 13 -93 -1541, § 1, 9- 17-93; Ord. No. 23 -94- 1573, § 1, 12- 20 -94; Ord. No. 8 -95 -1581, § 3, 6 -6 -95; Ord. No. 1 -96 -1601, § 1, 1- 16 -96; Ord. No. 8 -97 -1629, § 1, 4 -1 -97; Ord. No. 17- 03- 1801A, § 1, 9 -2 -03; Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928, § 2, 9 -4 -07) ORDINANCE NO. 27-07-1928 AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY INCORPORATING A NEW SECTION 20- 3.5(H) ENTITLED "SPECIAL DIMENSIONAL AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR TWO -STORY SINGLE .FAMILY STRUCTURES AND TWO -STORY ADDITIONS "; INCLUDING MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND LOT COVERAGE; MINIMUM YARD SETBACK; MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT; MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE; MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE; LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS; ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN REVIEW; FINDINGS; HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD REVIEW; DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission has expressed concern with the new construction of two -story residential homes and the addition of a second story to existing one story single family homes which may not be compatible with the scale and massing of their existing residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, it is believed that the aforesaid new construction and additions to existing single family residences are only the beginning of a trend that could increase as older single family residences in the City are sold for demolition or reconstruction; and WHEREAS, the City Commission enacted a moratorium on the construction of two -story homes on February 6, 2007, in order to provide sufficient time for the City to study the various issues associated with the development of compatible two - story homes; and WHEREAS, the City Commission held a series of workshop .with the Planning Board, Environmental Review Preservation Board, Historic Preservation Board, residences, developers and interested stakeholders to discuss the impact of compatible two -story homes on existing residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2007, the City Commission extended the moratorium to allow the City staff to complete the preparation amended single - family regulation and to schedule the required public hearings; and WHEREAS, the City Commission is cognizant and respectful of the rights of the owners of single family residential properties in the City, and have noted in the workshops that they are not against two -story homes provided that such development did not adversely ebange or alter the character of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board at its August 14, 2007 meeting, after public hearing, adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays recommending that the 1 Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928 proposed ordinance be approved NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Ordinance upon adoption hereof. SECTION 2. That the "Land Development Code of the City South Miami" shall be amended to incorporate a new Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special Dimensional and Performance Standards for Two -Story Single Family Structure and Two Story Additions." (A) Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish special dimensional and performance standards to regulate two -story single family structures and two -story additions within the residential zoning districts of the City of South Miami. (B) Applicability. The requirements of this Section shall be in addition to each and every other requirement of the City of South Miami Land Development Code (Code), and in the case of conflict, the provision of this Section shall control. (C) Performance Standards. The performance standard set forth in this section will guide the development of two -story residential homes in the single family residential district. The performance standards are necessary in order to address yard setbacks, open space, adequate landscaping, plan review process, and existing character of the residential neighborhoods in the City of South Miami. By implementing these standards the City will be able to preserve and enhance the neighborhood character through architectural designs that are consistent and responsive to the individual context of the City architecturally diverse neighborhoods. (1) Building Site. The development of two -story residential homes shall be constructed on a lot that is suitable for residential development, provides adequate setbacks and the necessary infrastructure to support the development. (2) Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size for residential homes shall be subject to the dimensional requirements set forth in the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family District' (Section 20- 3.5(E)). For irregular shaped lots, the average lot width rather than the frontage width shall be used at the discretion of the Planning Director. (3) Maximum Lot Coverage. The building coverage for the first floor area permitted for single family residences shall be equal to tbirtp (30) to twenty 20 �� percent of the building site depending on lot size as shown in Table 2 Section (C)11. 2 .Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928 (4) Yard Setback Requirements. No building or structure, or any part thereof, including covered porches or terraces, but not including uncovered steps, projections shall be erected at a lesser distance from the front, side or rear line of any building site than the front, side or rear setback distance, respectively, prescribed and established herein for such building site. Nothing herein shall prohibit a building or structure from having more than the minimum required setbacks. (a) Side Setbacks (Interior). Refer to Table 1: "Proposed Preliminary Minimum Side Yard Setbacks." TABLE 1 New Two -Story Single Family Residential and Second Story Additions Minimum Setbacks Requirements (Interior Lot) Side Interior Lot Width First Floor Setback Second Floor Setback 40-44 7.5 7.5 45-49 7.5 9.0 50 -54 7.5 10.0 55 -59 7.5 11.0 60 -64 7.5 12.0 65-69 8.5 13.0 70 -74 9.5 14.0 75 -+ 10.0 1 15.0 Side yards shall be measured from the closest point of the structure's vertical outside wall to the side lot line, on a bearing parallel to the front lot line, at ground level. Cumulative width of both interior side yards shall be not less than 20 percent of total lot width. (b) Front Setback. The minimum front setback shall be consistent with the dimensional requirements reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family District" (Section 20- 3.5(E)). (c) Side Setbacks (Street). The minimum side setback (street) for structure that abuts a street shall be consistent with the dimensional requirements reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single - Family District" (Section 20- 3.5(E)). N Ord—no. 27 -07 -1928 (d) Rear setback. The minimum rear setback of twenty -five (25) feet shall be maintained and required on principle buildings in the single - family residential district, as reflected on the Land Development Code table labeled "Dimensional Requirements Single- Family District" (Section 20- 3.5(E)). (5) Building Height Limit. No single family residential home shall be built in the City of South Miami that is more than two - stories in height. The maximum building height for two -story homes shall not exceed twenty -five (25) feet. (6) Maximum Building Coverage/Impervious Coverage. The maximum building coverage and impervious coverage shall be determined for each application by using the dimensional requirements set forth in subsection 11. (7) Landscape Requirements. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the entire front yard area shall be green space. All 4ent—yard areas shall be landscaped with trees and drought resistant native vegetation, as necessary, to enhance privacy from abutting properties. The landscaped open space required by this Section shall consist of pervious landscaped area and shall not consist of any paved or otherwise impervious areas. The minimum height of new trees for two -story homes shall be An inventory of existing trees located onsite shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department as part of the Environmental. Review Preservation Board (ERPB) application. The required landscaped plan shall be prepared by Florida Registered Landscape Architect consistent with the City's Tree Ordinance. (8) Architectural and Site Plan Review. All new two -story homes or second story additions shall be reviewed by the ERPB consistent with Section 20- 6.1(C) of the Land Development Code. The design review must be based on sound and clearly articulated design principles. The architectural plans must be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Architect. (a) The ERPB shall consider and apply the following features as part of the review: (i) Scale, color, texture, and appropriateness, and aesthetic quality of all proposed buildings and other structures; (ii) Quantity, quality and arrangement of all proposed landscaping and open space features; (iii) Overall compatibility of the proposed development with the existing and desired . character of the property and neighborhood in which located; and (iv) The installation of sidewalks along all arterial roadways and compliance with the City's sidewalk policies and requirements. 10 Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928 (b) Designs should use a mix of articulation, architectural elements and exterior finishes reducing the perceived scale and bulk of buildings, including low to moderately pitched roofs and recesses under roof creating indoor /out door living spaces (terraces). In considering the design of the building, the ERPB shall consider and apply Section 7(a)(i) thru (iii), and render a decision as to the adequacy of the ` 4kw ; g elements in the design concept including, but not limited to: Trim Shutters Awnings and canopies Windows (Fenestration) Doors Texture of surface Colors Roofs (materials,, color, slope and overhang) Planters Window boxes Walls, height, location, materials, design Height of building Location of structure on site Site circulation in regard to pedestrian travel, parking, services, grades and landscaping Location of exposed piping, conduits and rain water leaders The impact on adjacent properties of continuous two story walls Poearetive All lighting (height, location and style) (c) A Comprehensive Neighborhood Analysis, photographs of the site, and a statement explaining how the proposed building complies with the architectural style surrounding the site must be submitted as part of the ERPB application. The ERPB shall require changes to the plans to ensure that the design preserves the existing architectural style of the neighborhood, unless specified to the contrary, and promotes design excellence in the community. The ERPB, as part of the its application for review, shall require the submission of photographs of both sides of the street and all abutting properties, on the block where the new two -story home or two -story addition is to be constructed. (d) The architectural context includes the height, scale, massing, separation between buildings, and style in regard to how buildings and structures relate to each other within a specified area. Architectural context allows for differences in height, scale, massing, and separation between buildings and style, when such differences contribute to the overall harmony and character of the area. The ERPB shall not take into consideration existing buildings and structure that are out of context with 5 Ord. No. 27 -01 -1928 the area when considering whether a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is in context with both sides of the street on the block where it is located and surrounding properties. The ERPB shall review the building or structure in the context of that area in which the site is located when a new building or structure or a substantial addition to an existing building or structure is located on a building site that is on the border of two areas that have different character or content. (e) The Planning Director shall have the administrative discretion to require the above review process to be accomplished prior to a Planning Board public hearing on the proposed development application. (9) Findings. The ERPB shall determine approval or disapproval of the proposed designed plans. The Board shall prepare a written determination in order to state the intent of its decision. The written determination shall be filed with the Planning Department for inclusion in the project record. (10) Historic Preservation Board Review. Construction of a two -story home or a second story additions or alterations to existing homes in the City's Historic District shall be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board and ERPB. The Historic Preservation Board shall review the application for consistency with the City's historic preservation guidelines requirements set forth in this section, and the standards for the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness set forth in the Land Development Code. The Board shall also determine compatibility with the guidelines in the specific Historic Designation Report. The Historic Preservation Board recommendations shall be submitted to the ERPB for consideration. The ERPB shall give consideration to the findings of the Historic Preservation Board as part of its review for the purpose of determining consistency with the requirements set forth in this section. (11) Development Standards. The development standards are based on percentage of lot size consistent with the table provided below. The lot size shall be rounded -off in order to determine the appropriate lot size. 0 Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928 TABLE 2 New Two -Story Single Family Residential and Second Story Additions Percentage Requirements for Maximum Building Coverage, 1mn ,innc r.nverane and FAR Lot Size Maximum Building Coverage Maximum Impervious Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio 5,000 0.300 0.450 0.550 11000 0.300 0.450 0.525 7,000 0.300 0.438 0.500 81000 0.300 0.425 0.475 9,000 0.300 0.413 0.450 10,000 0300 0.400 0.450 11,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 12,ODO 0.300 0.400 0.450 13,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 14,000 0300 0.400 0.450 15,000 0.300 0.400 0.450 16,000 0.296 0.396 0.444 17,000 0.292 0.392 0.438 18,000 0.288 0388 0.432 19,000 0.284 0.384 0.426 20,000 0.280 0.380 0.420 21,000 0.276 0.376 0.414 22,000 0.272 0372 0.408 23,000 0.268 0.368 0.402 24,000 0.264 0.364 0.396 25,000 0.260 0.360 0.390 26,000 0.256 0.356 0.384 27,000 0.252 0.352 0.378 28,000 0.248 0.348 0.372 29,000 0.244 D.344 0.366 30 000 0.240. 0340 0.360 31,000 0.236 0336 0.354 32,000 0.232 0.332 0.348 33,000 0.228 0.328 0.342 34,000 0.224 0324 0.336 35,000 0.220 0.320 0.330 36,000 0.216 0.316 0.324 37,000 0.212 0.312 0.318 38,000 0.206 0.308 0.312 39,000 0.204 0.304 0.306 40,000+ 0.20D 0.300 0.300 SECTION 3. Applications for construction of new two -story residential homes or for new two -story additions to existing homes filed with the ERPB prior to the enactment of Ordinance No. 03 -07 -1904 shall be grandfathered. VA Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928 SECTION 4. Applications for construction of new two -story residential homes or new two -story additions to existing homes requesting review by the ERPB after enactment of this ordinance shall comply with the requirements of this ordinance. SECTION S. In case conflicting regulations exist, the requirements set forth in this regulation shall apply. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. SECTION 8. This ordinance shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this o// 4day of C y1C CLERK READ AND APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY,lyFT RNEY 1st Reading: 8/21/07 2nd Reading: 9/4/07 4�_" ' 2007 Commission Vote:" Mayor Feliu Vice Mayor Wiscombe: Commissioner Palmer: Commissioner Birts- Cooper: Commissioner Beckman: P: \Comm ttems12007T9-4 -07\Me Mansion Ordinance 8- 14- 2007PImming Board Heuinzdoc 5 -0 Yea Yea Yea Yea Yea MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays Miami, Miauei�Dade County, Florida STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE: Before the undersigned authority personally appeared V. PEREZ, who on oath says that he or she is the LEGAL CLERK, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT. PUBLIC HEARING - JULY 13, 2010 in the XXXX Court, was published in. said newspaper in the issues of 07/02/2010 Affiant further says that the said Miami Daily Business Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertise r publication in the said me . newspaper. r I n Swotand efore me this —� 02 ]AD 10 f (SEAL) V. PEREZ personally known to me RIA4.ME5A •s <9v�• w`i'`= h>,Y CG \fih4155i q)N R D17 0i2 70 eXpIFIEa;he9rchA�2 �`FfTa'1tF, eordne 'I ";mnw;ny ^Lk;iaurnap+lnare Applicant;. City o - :' ,A6 0rdinannepf THURSDAY, JULY 8, 2010 I RISE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI Planning and Zoning Department - 6730 Sunset Drive; South Miami, Florida 33143 - Phone; (305).663 -6926; Fax #: (305) 660 -7356. On Tuesday, 4uly 13, 2010 at 7:301'.M., the City of South Miami' Planning, Goal d will conduct public hearings in the City Commission Chambers at the above address on,the,following items::r' . PB- 70 -05 (cunttnuedl '. - .AOpiiesud: City of South Miami An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending file Land Development Code by deleting Section 20- 3.1(E) entitled "Business Outside a Building'.', inserting now Section 20 -3.5 M to be entitled "Commercial Activity Conducted Outside df a.Building" in order to provide. regulatiens'far allowing fornutside merchandise display on private property and public property; establishing limitations on type, location and extent of outside merchandise display providing .0 process for obtaining permits; and providing for exceptions for certain permitted uses; providing tor, severability; Pro' roviding for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. ' PBA 0- 007 (continue di Applicant 'City of South Miami An ordinance of the Mayor and City commission of the City of South Miami, Florida fa amem[Section 20 -3.3 (0) of the Land Development. Code entitled "Permitted Ose Schedule" in order to change Old B oup Home I use category from a "P" Permitted use category to the "S" Special Use category; and amending Section 20 -3.4 entitled "Special use conditions "'in order to set forth in and special requirements applicable to Group, Home .I uses; providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and ,providing an effective date. PQ -10 -fill Applicamo American Car Detailing . .Location: 17301 SW 57th Court A Resolution of the Mayor and City Commission of the city of South Miami, relating to 'a request pursuant to Section 20- 3.3(0) of the Land Development Code for special use approval; to operate a mobi fe car wash in an "SR(HD-01n" Speciaity;Refail (Hometown District Overlay) zoning district, specifically located in the parking.garage of Plaza 57 an office building at 7301 SW 57th Court( and providing for an effective date.. re- 1a•D12 Applicant: City of South Miami, An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts" by transferringali:provisions related to two story single family structures lo'existing Section 20- 3.5(H) entitled "Special dimensional: and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions"; and making technical, adjustments to Section 20 -3.5di Providing for sevetol fly; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. " Local Planning Agency On Tuesday, July 13, 201.0 at 7:30 P.M., the City OLSo.uth Miami Planning Board acting in its capacity as the Local Planning Agency will conduct public hearings in the City Commission :Chambers at the above*address on the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map: PB -10 -013 ' Applicant: City of South Miaihi . Location: 6820 SW 64 Avenue An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the, future land use category from Single- Family Residential (Two -Story) to Parks and Open Space for the property identified as All- America Park located at 6020 SW 64 Avenue (Folio No. 09 4025.000- 0430); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective clans..; B -10 -014 Applicant: City of South Miami Location: 7806SW59Avenue An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Cum hbssion of the City of South Miami . Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South, Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use category from Single - Family Residential ( Two - Story) to Parks and Open Space for the property identified as Van Smith Park located at 7800 SW 59 Avenue (folio No. 09- 4036- 039.0020 and Folio No. 09- 4036 - 039 - 0025);, providing for severability; providing for ordinances in, conflict; and providing an effective date .. -PB -10 -015 Applicant: City of South Miami Location: 8051 SW 58 Avenue An Ordinance of.the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida; amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan by changing the future land use category from Single - Family Residential (Two- Story) to Parks and Open Space for the property identified as Dison Park located at 0051 SW 53 Avenue (polio No. 09- 4036 -000- 0526); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. PB -10 -076 Applicant:. City of South Miami - - - Location: 7435 SW 66 Avenue An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami Florida, amending the Future Land Use Map of the South Miami Comprehensive Plan . by changing the future land use category from Educational (four. Story). to Single - Family Residential (Two -Story) for the property identified as the Rethan residence located at 7435 SW 66 Avenue (Folio No. 09 -4036- 050 - 0020); providing for severability; providing for ordinances fn "'oonflict; and providing an effective date. .: All interested parties are urged to attend. Objections or expressions of approval may be made In person at the hearing or filed in writing prior to or at the hearing: The Planning Board reserves the right to recommend to the City Commission whatever the board considers in the best . interest for the area involved. interested parties .requesting information are.asked to contact the Planning and Zoning Department by calling 305 - 663 -6326 or writing to the address indicated above. You are hereby advised that H any person desires to appeal any decision made with respect loony matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence unnn which the aooeal is to be based (ES. 286.0105). Refer to hearing number when malting any inquiry. _ CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI DRAFT PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting MEETING MINUTES 0 Tuesday, July 13, 2010 A City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. EXCERPT I. Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 9:20 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. II. Roll Call Action: Chair Yates requested a roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mrs. Yates, Mr. Morton, Mrs. Young, Mr. Whitman, Mr. Farfan, Mr. Cruz and Mrs. Beckman. Board members absent: None City staff present: Thomas J. Vageline (Planning & Zoning Director), Sanford A. Youkilis (Planning & Zoning Consultant), Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator), Lourdes Cabrera - Hernandez (Principal Planner) and Alerik Barrios (Secretary). Deputy City Attorney: Mr. Mark Goldstein III. Administrative Matters: No Administrative Matters IV. Planning Board Applications/Public Hearings PB -10 -012 Applicant: City of South Miami An Ordinance of the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, amending the Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts" by transferring all provisions related to two story single family structures to existing Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions "; and making technical adjustments to Section 20- 3.5(H); providing for severability; providing for ordinances in conflict; and providing an effective date. Action: Mrs. Yates read the item into the record. Planning Board Meeting July 13, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Mrs. Cabrera - Hernandez informed the Board that the item is a technical amendment clarification to the Land Development Code. This is being done to avoid a design conflict and to provide consistency within the Code. LDC Section 23.5 (E) entitled "Dimensional Standards Single Family Districts ", regulates dimensional standards for both one -story and two -story design single family districts and must be consistent with Section 20- 3.5(H), entitled "Special dimensional and performance standards for two -story single structure and two -story additions ". In 2007, this later section was added to the Land Development Code by Ord. No. 27 -07 -1928. Currently, the Land Development Code Section 23.5 (E), allows for the second floor a sixty percent maximum building coverage for the first floor for all single - family zoning districts. This is no longer applicable since Section 23.5 (H) overrides with more restricted design guideline and dimensional requirements for two -story single family structures. Staff is recommending that in order to avoid a potential design conflict, provide consistency within the Code, and have a clear distinction as to the dimensional requirements between a one -story and a two -story single - family residential design regulation, minor revisions are being proposed to Sec. 20 -3.5 (A), (C), (E) and (H). Mrs. Yates questioned if this item was a public hearing. Mr. Goldstein responded that it is a public hearing, but not a quasi-judicial hearing. The Chair opened the public hearing. No speakers The Chair closed the public hearing. Mrs. Young questioned the Special Dimensional Standards. Mrs. Cabrera- Hernandez responded that was a portion that was added to the Land Development Code at a later date. She commented that Section 23.5 is labeled (H) since all the other letters are taken previously. Mr. Morton questioned if the floor area ratio is reducing the buildable area, was that the intent. Mr. Vageline replied that when the Code was changed to add (H) a few years ago it created a conflict with certain sections of the Code. What was found was that applicants would come in to review a proposed single - family home plan they would discover that the second floor requirement was sixty percent of the first floor. Then drawings were incorrect since they did not look at the table in (H) section. If the issue is clarified, the numbers will all be in one place that should be easier for the applicants. Motion: Mrs. Beckman moved to defer the application in order to review the item. Mr. Whitman seconded. Votes 1 Ayes 5 Nays Mr. Whitman commented that table one on page eight is inconsistent with (b) for Minimum Setback requirements. Mrs. Yates responded that if the individual is building on a new lot the setback has to be 10 feet on the second floor. However, if you're in an existing old building the Planning Board Meeting July 13, 2010 Page 3 of 3 dimensions would be 7.5. Mr. Vageline commented that section (b) comes from the old Dimensional Requirements for a one story building in the single family residential districts. Mr. Morton commented that wording "new lot' needs to be changed to vacant. Mrs. Beckman questioned what is a pre - existing improved lots. Mrs. Yates commented that it is an existing lot with a building that could have additions made. Mr. Cruz commented that there could be some modifications instead of deferring the item. Mrs. Yates commented that there needs to be clarifications and make sure it is correct. Motion: Mr. Cruz moved to approve the proposed amendment as presented. Mrs. Young seconded. Vote: 5 Ayes 1 Nays (Mrs. Beckman) V. MINUTES: Minutes of the June 15, 2010 will be distributed at the next meeting. (Tuesday, August 10, 2010). VI. Adjournment: Action: There being no further business before the Board, Mrs. Yates adjourned the Planning Board meeting at 11:30 P.M. TJV /SAY X:\PB\PB Minutes\2010 Minutes\ 7- 13- 2010\LPA.Minutes.7.13.2010.doc w w cc (n (n wi zj! 0 Lo U; 0 z !\ �} � \ 0 9v 6 } \�h � \ . -SE SSrs amn a P� �rvy g 9m 1ES!!c Y 1a9S 'v "uc.' c g a U O E m w u o = e s 8 a$� K `= E3 2�ES � .s onr�P aoaE �="ioo'.2 ,Q�S Ss � r� `'A�E y? 2,.b am ' u = mE u�E m. E w �P gU smm F'o o �A °_&� °� =- e�m. mq�o's8 N.'apme so g.t'aa '- b$� a' as �xh UJ mOgr''cm E >. &'� �" "� E `2 Sm "� om..9, �, o =y Q0..Z'A n #-'' @Ss �= Vm`s 8a =o �'���+`rry °�n3n $:� g'� z° ng €�� °_` $ywo s3$ '& "mS i eM �;a ao 2AoV hN Egw� ng a ny. �..° d3 ua� 562 s9E E.S e� n nzx s =a'`�. j@ j�,0:�4 �6Iw $ 44 =Z E @uS nE'AS E 5���E iC 6t �v m2'� S o. ,w ,Sco E a 00 lk »-6 os 6E oa�n X on�E= I,--- �c€ �= g a ,'n a5 o a a°' ssuE�s' € s =�tlm .R gg��y6 <° �.� @__ten @ oA» @sn $ AoEs Sti " R NW �N mom_'E' 2 5 az c`nm m 39 S�iy m � Ec' LLmo =v g4 LL� -° wm_'s$ �� � M° °aE - Lf p9Oa za �� =yoA&m dgs m o 2,a A, g p =�yyy � amoE =,Np3 mza.zw'p. PoS� s h.m @� = <�s°.a "em mB��tV s� a� `mao s g 5 }} Oe w "S'm -sw c, 5 mcE F_'�` a £ FF S:Ev '.: a as ''g@`@�.sg .31 m "µEs .9w I'3= g3'?Asmo EBsaA Uv 860.�m�LL. $a.� mBiY E6 y+y N. Ern EC mm O_ -_ Sh@gfi SS " =' ,0 mi��w 2° u�� %m�� m.�'a�4g°4g c� €w 42 � s x8S aL �2N _� g ^g tcgom s „ E 4vE E�, mw `LjwG 6 .v Ec # "v OY�'T'e?�" E Oc 9E Ep nEm.:^.."'.i oawt ppc F4 OEB�Em O. '°e° mmo's .e ri�0a =�'E pi b E S °v E._Eo ¢ - v�. e g =ooE € pfic�e c °z �.�� �m&om538 $.s a =v�io�s �mmtn �mw, 30.830.m.. n.�_i��u�oA 6� d`c+:nswo aOLLSo pueiu¢> Ru¢ ¢sotlmtlm Ao lloltlxe Rey. Fve ul io'syiow enpenpop ¢iew> A>u Rew noA'Peie >Ipul efietl pue oiap ¢yA vo plv�eN Iwe1W oyl ul Pweatltle pe oVl leyi »vaPMe enlsnpvo> s¢ p¢pMOitl sl (y)losyg3 siyl :uo0dposa0 Mve :ad61iolo0 OLOZ /9Z /6o :ezea uoi}eoilgnd epe01SE3SAse3q;n0S SUSN :9uOZ/e6ed 1uOOO9S 0'0 M :eZIS IWtlIW H1ftOS 30 AllO :�esivanpy LOLS6S458 :RagwnN uolyesui (��Yt11�]r'1f Itt11n[''tj �x� :OWON 3uaI10 WSM99 aagwnN py ` V.IO�i /lliC�l jr.O`i Iy E ro N N M T 3 N T co N co to O rn CM ' - Q C y a a u_ M :9 Ci � w � o pueiu¢> Ru¢ ¢sotlmtlm Ao lloltlxe Rey. Fve ul io'syiow enpenpop ¢iew> A>u Rew noA'Peie >Ipul efietl pue oiap ¢yA vo plv�eN Iwe1W oyl ul Pweatltle pe oVl leyi »vaPMe enlsnpvo> s¢ p¢pMOitl sl (y)losyg3 siyl :uo0dposa0 Mve :ad61iolo0 OLOZ /9Z /6o :ezea uoi}eoilgnd epe01SE3SAse3q;n0S SUSN :9uOZ/e6ed 1uOOO9S 0'0 M :eZIS IWtlIW H1ftOS 30 AllO :�esivanpy LOLS6S458 :RagwnN uolyesui (��Yt11�]r'1f Itt11n[''tj �x� :OWON 3uaI10 WSM99 aagwnN py ` V.IO�i /lliC�l jr.O`i Iy E ro N N M T 3 N T co N co