Loading...
Res No 231-10-13265RESOLUTION NO. 231-10-13265 A Resolution of the Mayor & City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, relating to a request for a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) of the Land Development Code to allow a front setback of 23.5 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the 'IRS-3", Low Density Residential zoning use district; the purpose of the variance is to correct an error made when the home was constructed in 1987; providing for an effective date. WHEREAS, Application No. PB -10 -028 was submitted to the Planning Board by applicant, Illiana Villa - Roehr, said application requesting approval of a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) to allow a front setback of 23.5 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the "RS -3 ", Low Density Residential Zoning Use District; the purpose of the variance is to correct an error made when the home was constructed in 1987 ; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located on a cul -de -sac and is an irregularly shaped property; and WHEREAS, the applicant has set forth in a letter of Intent/Hardship, dated September 7, 2010 that the front setback was not measured correctly by the surveyor or the contractor made an error during the 1987 construction of the home; and WHEREAS, the applicant is in the process of selling the property and the purchase can not be completed as long as the setback violation remains; and WHEREAS, the approval of a variance requires a recommendation from the Planning Board and the approval of the City Commission after a public hearing; and WHEREAS, at its September 23, 2010 meeting the Planning Board, after public hearing, voted 5 ayes 0 nays to recommend approval of the variance requested; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Commission of the City of South Miami desire to accept the recommendation of the Planning Board. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT: Section I. That the subject application submitted by applicant Illiana Villa - Roehr, said application requesting approval of a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) to allow a front setback of 23.5 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the "RS -3 ", Low Density Residential Zoning Use District is hereby approved. Res. No. 231 -10 -13265 2 Section 2. That the approval of the subject variance is based upon an affirmative finding that the requested variance meets the following criterion set forth in LDC Section 20- 5.9(H): (1) The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; (2) Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; (3) The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; (4) The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of land, building or structure; (5) That the approval of the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Section 3. This resolution shall be effective immediately after the adoption hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19, day ofOctobe ;2010 ATTEST: APPROVED: CITY CLERK MAYO Commission Vote: 5 -0 READ AND PROVED AS TO FORM Mayor Stoddard: Yea AND SUF CI 'NCY: Vice Mayor Newman: Yea Commissioner Palmer: Yea Commissioner Beasley: Yea Commissioner Harris: Yea CITY ATTORNEY X: \Comm Items\2010 \10 -19 -10 \Variance 5743 SW 76 Ten Resol.doc CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM South Miami As•A+�r s 2001 To: The Honorable Mayor Stoddard and Members of the City Commission Via: Hector Mirabile, Ph.D., City Manager From: Thomas J. Vageline, Director Planning and Zoning Departme Date: October 19, 2010 ITEM No A Resolution of the Mayor & City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, relating to a request for a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) of the Land Development Code to allow a front setback of 23.55 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the "RS -311, Low Density Residential Zoning Use district; the purpose of the variance is to correct an error made when the home was constructed in 1987; providing for an effective date. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from Section 20- 3.5(E), Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts, of the Land Development Code (LDC) to permit an existing one story single family home to have a front setback of 23.55 feet where a minimum required front setback is 25 feet in the RS -3 Single Family Residential Zoning District. The intent of the variance request is to correct an encroachment error made at the time of the 1987 construction so that the owners may sell the property. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS (See ATTACHMENT) • Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E), Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts • Land Development Code Section 20 -5.9 (G) Permitted Variance requests • Land Development Code Section 20- 5.9(H) variance Approvals • Land Development Code Section 20- 6.1(B)(3)(h), Planning Board, Powers and Duties BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS: The subject property is located on a cul-de-sac and is an irregularly shaped property. It has a net area of 10,463 sq. ft. The applicant has set forth in a letter of Intent/Hardship, dated September 7, 5743 SW 76 Terr. Variance - Setback 2 2010 that the front setback was not measured correctly by the surveyor or the contractor made an error during construction. The owner discovered the error during the due diligence process prior to the sale of the property. The buyer's mortgage company has refused to close on the purchase as long as the setback violation remains. STAFF ANALYSIS: In reviewing a variance request the Land Development Code requires that the criteria set forth in Section 20- 5.9(H) should be applied. Section 20 -5.9 Variance approvals (H) All variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following criterion: 1. The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property: The variance relates only to this one property and is a condition which could result in the property owner being unable to use or sell the property. 2. Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the restriction ofthe zoning ordinance when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly a pressive because of conditions of property that distinguish it from other aroperties under similar zoning restrictions: The error in measurement by a surveyor or contractor can result when a property is an irregular shape or located on a curvilinear cul -de -sac, which distinguishes this property from other properties 3. The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; The applicant was not responsible for the setback error which was the fault of the original survey. 4. The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use o the land building or structure The requested variance is very small (1.45 feet); it is the absolute minimum to meet the required front setback. 5. That the approval o (-the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose o the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public wed are. The requested variance will have no impact upon surrounding properties or the neighborhood. PLANNING BOARD ACTION The Planning Board after public hearing on September 23, 2010, adopted a motion by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays recommending approval of the variance request. 5743 SW 76 Terr. Variance - ,Setback RECOMMENDATION: The applicant's claim of hardship due to the irregular shape of the lot is supportable under the variance decision criteria set forth in Section 20 -5.9. it is recommended that the variance request be approved. Attachments: Draft resolution Application . Letter oflntent and Justification Letter Location Map Current property survey Property Survey (1987) Land Development Code (LDC) Applicable Regulations Planning Dept. Staff Report9 -23 -10 Planning Board Minutes Excerpt 9 -23 -10 Copy of Public Notices TSV /SAY X. \Comm items12010 \10- I9- 10\Varimce $743 SW 76 Terr -Front setback, CM Report.doc City of South Miami Planning & Zoning Department City Hall, 6130 Sunset Drive, South Miami, Florida 33143 Telephone: (305) 663 -6326; Fax: (305) 668 -7356 Application For Public Bearing Before Manning Board & City Commission ;s of Subject Property:S7V3 �'W 'Z6 9`��nw=- •�oit'/ & Bounds: Vll w�- 2o�flo� Phone: T S�6- 5"466 ant: X"L /�4N�¢ _ -7—WG.. Arizc AJ4 V1,4-C4 - kCJD'W'11" ,Io:S45:F'14 Address: /3'7 3 6 S c Phone: c„rf, Signature.ca- i44,v,- Phone: Phone: Contract to purchase )LEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE ITEM: iNariance Text Amendment to LDC —V . �Zoning Map Amendment _Special Use — PUD Approval _Special Exception PUD Major Change Other (Waiver of Plat) 3riefly explain application and cite specific Code sections: VA- R %a >2Q Subsection:_ Page #:_ Amended Date: to purchase Tenant/Lessee >LE,ME CHECK ALL THAT APPLY: Letter of intent Justifications for change _ Statement of hardship (roof of ownership or letter from owner Power of attorney ^ Contract to purchase _ 1 ;current survey (1 original sealed and signed /1 reduced copy @ 11" x 17 ") ✓5 copies of Site Pian;and Floor Plans I �reduced copy @ 1'r° x 17" VAffidavit- Receipts attesting to mail notices sent V'Maiiing labels (3 sets) and map ✓Required Fee(s) The undersigned has read this completed application and represents that the information and all submitted materials are true and corre 1: to & bet pplicant's knowledge and belief �� �Q�y W V�Fs' �r 7— 24)10 fP1, bel ief _1L ss�li r� ©c�/���' F e v�2 Applicant's Signature and title Print Name Date Upon receipt a plications and all submitted materials will be reviewed for compliance with the Land Development Code and other applicable regulations. Applications found not in compliance will be rejected and returned to the applioant. OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Filed pate of PB Hearing Date of Commission Petition Required Petition Accepted,_„_,`.,_._._ of September 7th, 2010 City of South Miami Planning and Zoning Department 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, FL 33143 Re: Property at 5743 SW 76 Te, Miami, FL 33143, Folio # 09- 4036 - 077 -0030 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, in Block 1 of SARA PARK, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 131, at Page 20 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida The above property was acquired by owners in 1987 through a direct purchase from the developer of SARA PARK. Prior to closing on the property a survey was performed on June 24, 1987 by JAMES BEADMAN & ASSOC, INC, a consulting surveyor hired we assume by the title company doing the closing. During this survey no encroachments, easement violations or violations of any other nature were detected by surveyor (See copy of survey attached). This property has never been surveyed again since then. We have decided to sell the property and at the present time we have an executed purchase and sale contract. A recent survey ordered by the buyer (Aug 13, 2010) has found an encroachment from the south -east corner of the garage into the 25' building set back line of 1.45'; i.e. the set back at that point is 23.55' instead of the 25' minimum. Evidently, this violation of the 25' front building setback has existed since the property was built by the developer and has gone undetected for the last 23 years. Both the buyer and the buyer's mortgage lender have indicated that they will not close on the purchase transaction so long as there is a violation of the front set back requirement. This situation has created an undue burden on the property and us as owners in that: a) The original survey•from 1987 did not accurately portray the set back violation by developer. b) The City's building department at the time, approved the construction and granted the CO to the developer. c) We proceeded with the purchase trusting all permits had been cleared with the City and unaware there was a serious violation from the beginning. This situation has created a undue hardship, 1) making the property the target for any third party law suit to enforce the minimum set back and 2) making the property virtually unsalable as no mortgage lender will accept the property as collateral for a mortgage loan so long as the front set back violation exists, thus depriving owners of a right enjoyed by all other owners of adjacent lots. The property is located at the back of a dead end out de sac, and the granting of the front set back variance will not in any manner effect traffic in the area. We are innocent victims of this situation. We did not create same nor did we have any knowledge of same, nor had any reasonable basis for having knowledge of same until now. We are hereby respectfully requesting that the City of South Miami's Planning Board and City Commission grant this property a specific variance to the minimum platted front set back of 25', based on the fact that this variance is necessary to relieve a particular extraordinary condition which is not a result from actions by the owners. This request is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the future reasonable use of the property and will not be detrimental to the neighborhood or to the public interest. We greatly appreciate your approval to this request for variance that would relieve us from the current great hardship. Yours respectfully, (LIANA VILLA -ROEHR LUDWIK JOSEPH ROEHR Owner Owner N 022 t4 4 760D N 7520 59 §4 City of South Miami PB -10 -028 Variance Front Setback 5743 SW 76 Terrace Feet n inn inn inn 600 900 1,200 SUNSET R SW 72ND ST A E®g o � � 5700 C rat'' 6750 5138 fe T230 �f0 err 7230 n e 6 0 10 885 m 6820 5795 7230 c 7301 SW 73RD ST EEB A E a 6940 31331 5824 ,'� 7320 7300 7311 0 7325 450 7827 7310 7720 7301 C 5191 s 7390 c 7376 ST A Y 7400 TE X50 690tl 5875 5801 3791 11 SW 74TH TER 7420 @ 5860 7697 - 7620 5838 7441 7430 7634 7500 7541 33 7641 U _ 7532 7663 7648 7740 m nm 7650 3 1831 P31 77 40 514 5520. y ]7500 7901 @ 7821 7820 9 7910 7821 7820 7930 7921 5981 SB61 5949 @ > U 7861 7830 6785 $775 rrC 6741 7910 e 5860 7697 - 7620 5838 7515 I 7634 7500 7541 33 7641 _ _ 7532 7663 7648 0 U 0 573D 7450 A y 7505 n7510 7500 A 7621 7520 @ 7533 9 7630 7550 8 7549 SUBJECT x 7 7600 7601 7600 us'i 7621 7697 - 7620 7620 7621 I 7634 7628 F } 9 7641 4 p 0 w 7720 7634 7740 m nm 7650 3 1831 P31 77 40 7621 - 7620 7637 V7630 I 7630 7631 7640 9 7710 7710 p 2 7720 7741 7740 7611 7621 5852 5864 C V7630 I li 7631 7810 9 � 5960 p 2 7821 7801 7800 QIAI PROPERTY S $723 S 76TH TER F 76Do R S6D0 5765 5751 a R C F 'TH @ @ C ° 7801 I li 7801 7810 9 � 5960 PROPERTY S $723 S 76TH TER F 76Do R S6D0 5765 5751 a R C F 'TH @ @ C BROVVNDR- 7801 7800 7801 7810 9 ° 5960 7800 7821 7801 7800 3 1831 7830 5520. 7901 7900 i 7901 @ 7821 7820 9 7910 7821 7820 7930 7921 5981 SB61 5949 @ f U 7861 7830 6785 $775 rrC 6741 7910 e 7901 7830 SW 79TH ST h 7910 7911 7911 y ,7880 6990 1900 7931 7930 7931 5907 7980 69B9 5957 .WD 5885 5871 5891 PROPERTY S $723 S 76TH TER F 76Do R S6D0 5765 5751 a R C F 'TH @ @ C BROVVNDR- 7801 7800 780D 7821 7620 1831 7830 5520. 7901 7900 i 7901 @ 9 7910 7931 7930 7921 @ f 6785 $775 rrC 6741 7910 e NO ACCESS 0.50' CF—_ Z O W 'P in W 1 to O hY - L CLF EQUIPMENT No NO. atta. o A = Central Angle = Center Line CLF 21.70' t PAR�pt /C =Air Conditioner j .i ASPH °Asphalt = Concrete �• BBQ = Barbecue - Deed C = Calculated .0 o m 4 CS - Catch Basin 0 r) r CBS - Concrete Block Structure 0 ^ I Ngl CH Ch =Chord = Chattahoochee NO ACCESS 0.50' CF—_ Z O W 'P in W 1 to O hY - L CLF EQUIPMENT No NO. DEDICATED) atta. ¢ = Center Line CLF 21.70' 0.55 c1. _- %Oi =Clear Conc. = Concrete �• D - Deed tTi / .e.u.�yi rtrr: = Diameter L4L t'- t� S. �M I =Drill Hole '71 V W.M G�- DME Fnd. DH / o (No I.D.) Fnd. 'h"Rebar c (No LD.} - Encroachment - F.H. - Fire Hydrant N A' 13' PKWY DEDICATED) Miami, Florida 33186 (305) 278 -2494 LOOD ZONE: X 1 BASE: N/A 3 -10 11 " =20' 1 NMJR 1 10 -0180 atta. ¢ = Center Line CLF =Chain Link Fence e, CI. =Clear Conc. = Concrete O D - Deed y = Diameter �M DH =Drill Hole '71 V + DME - Drainage & Maintenance E3sm4 / Easm't =Easement Enc - Encroachment F.H. - Fire Hydrant FIP = Found 112' Iron Pipe FIR = Found 1/2' Iron Rebar FPL - Florida Power & Ught ID - Identification y ,..... I.P. =Iron Pipe LB = Licensed Business LME =Lake Maintenance Easement , C.P. - Light Pole M - Measured MAINT. = Maintenance ME = Maintenance Easement fj = Monument Line Page 20, of the Mon. N/A = Monume =Not Applicant ble N/D - Nail & Disc N' - Number NTS =Not to Scale ( Old Republic o/S - offset yas O.u.L = Overhead Utility lines their interests P - Plat PB . Plat Book PC - Point of Curvature PCP - Permanent Control Point 143 PG - Page P.I. - Point of Intersection 0 PKWY :- Parkway t = Property Line I Terrace). PL - Planter PLS - Professional land Surveyor a 10 foot wide P.O.B. = Point of Beginning P.O,C. = Point of Commencement P.P, =Power Pole -)onion of a 5 foot PRC - Point of Reverse Curvature PRM = Point of Reference Monument PT - Point of Tangency !Setback. R - Radius Res. - Residence pf fences not determined. R.L.S. = Registered Land Surveyor RNG -Range R/R - Railroad ISM = Registered Surveyor & Mapper it R/W - Rightof -Way j(� Sdwk = Sidewalk 'A Sec. =Section f3STRACT NOT REVIEWED. T -Tangent OT REVIEWED. TW? °Township A.l any U,E = utility asement ty Britten consent of the Surveyor. consent e UTIL Utility W.F. - =Wood Fence W.M. =Water Meter WME - Wail Maintenance Easement MOJARENA & ASSOCIATES, INC. e w� E Certificate Land Surveyors & Mappers, of Authorization No. 6698 12925 S.W. 132nd Avenue Miami, Florida 33186 (305) 278 -2494 LOOD ZONE: X 1 BASE: N/A 3 -10 11 " =20' 1 NMJR 1 10 -0180 U w Y N Z O F 4 O J r W D N U- 0 Z V uj W Y N n � z t � J r r K � � U r � � a r u 4 LL s O. WU g; x: \ Z 4 p a a u F x t 9 r 3 N z m o a 3 d P v N � W O O JSP N; �t W I ll q N w N R U 6 ICI s ,N ( ..: 0 V O Z e�Y "1 W l W o N ow Lu O N W '^ K mp W OtU 2 Q !.4p W 4f yro. ce N N �-" Z< q V= G d' Ox m w a z 40 > W u' r z a = C) "' �- Z N r Q Z Z z rr w u w N tl N a _ h O Zr Q Y• 2 4 Wtla O W �` J ,' v W 0 tN F L Q w 441 a U= N O ti t co 0 Q _ z V 4 �d w tl T N i C 0 N m M u W a N n W 2 k 2 d � Q W o J a O v w <60 o j Z � J Y O = W O n WAS, 2 w W z W O m 4 "9' en LL O x LL w x v`�i i n � z t � J r r K � � U r � � a r u 4 LL s O. WU g; x: \ Z 4 p a a u F x t 9 r 3 N 5743 SW 76 Tem variance - Setback ATTACHMENTS LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS • Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E) DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Single - Family Districts REQUIREMENT RS -3 Setback Front (£t) 25' • Land Development Code Section 20 -5.9 (G) Variance Approvals (G) Permitted Variance Requests. Applications for variances shall be restricted to only the following: Yard setbacks (2) Lot size (3) Lot coverage (4) Building height (5) Fences and was (6) Impervious coverage (7) Off- street parking (8) Open space (9) Signs (10) Landscaping 5743 SW 76 Terr. Variance - Setback • Land Development Code Section 20- 6.1(B)(3)(h), Planning Board, Powers and Duties (h) The board shall review and make recommendations on all applications for variances from the requirements of this Code for yard setbacks, lot size, lot coverage, building height, fences and walls, impervious coverage, off - street parking, open space, signs and landscaping. Recommendations for a variance shall be made based upon the criteria set forth in Section 20- 5.9(H). Land Development Code Section 20- 5.9(1-1) All variance decision shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following criterion: (1) The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relating to a specific property; (2) Denial of the variance would result in hardship to the owner. Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning ordinance, when applied to a particular property, becomes arbitrary, confiscatory or unduly oppressive because of conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties under similar zoning restrictions; (3) The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; (4) The requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make possible the reasonable use of land, building or structure; (5) That the approval of the variance will be in consistent with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. To: Honorable Chair & Date: September 23, 2010 Planning Board Members From: Thomas J. Vageline, Director Re: Variance Request Planning and Zoning Departmen 5743 SW 76 Terrace PB -10 -028 Applicant: Iliana Villa -Roehr Location: 5743 SW 76 Terrace A Resolution of the Mayor & City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, relating to a request for a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) of the Land Development Code to allow a front setback of 23.55 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the "BS -3 ", Low Density Residential Zoning Use district; the purpose of the variance is to correct an error made when the home was constructed in 1987; providing for an effective date. APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a variance from Section 20- 3.5(E), Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts, of the Land Development Code (LAC) to permit an existing one story single family home to have a front setback of 23.55 feet where a minimum required front setback is 25 feet in the RS -3 Single Family Residential Zoning District. The intent of the variance request is to correct an encroachment error made at the time of the 1987 construction so that the owners may sell the property. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS (SeeATTACHMENT) • Land Development Code Section 20- 3.5(E); Dimensional Requirements Single - Family Districts • Land Development Code Section 20 -5.9 (G) Permitted Variance requests • Land Development Code Section 20- 5.9(H) Variance Approvals • Land Development Code Section 20-6. 1 (B)(3)(h), Planning Board, Powers and Duties BACKGROUND & ANALi SIS: The subject property is located on a cul -de -sac and is an irregularly shaped property. It has a net area of 10,463 sq. ft. The applicant has set forth in a letter of Intent/Hardship, dated September 7, 2010 that the front setback was not measured correctly by the surveyor or the contractor made an error during construction. The owner discovered the error during the due diligence process prior 5743 SW 76 Terr. Variance - Setback Sep 23, 2010 2 to the sale of the property. The buyer's mortgage company has refused to close on the purchase as long as the setback violation remains. STAFF ANALYSIS: In reviewing a variance request the Land Development Code requires that the criteria set forth in Section 20- 5.9(H) should be applied. Section 20 -5.9 Variance approvals (H) All variance decisions shall be based on an affirmative finding as to each of the following criterion: 1 The variance is necessary to relieve particular extraordinary conditions relatin two a specific Proper The variance relates only to this one property and is a condition which could result in the property owner being unable to use or sell the property. 2. Denial of the variance would result in hardsh?�pto the owner. Hardship results if the restriction of the zoning restrictions: The error in measurement by a surveyor or contractor can result when a property is an irregular shape or located on a curvilinear cul -de -sac, which distinguishes this property from other properties 3 The extraordinary conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; The applicant was not responsible for the setback error which was the fault of the original survey. 4. Tize requested variance is the minimum variance necessary zo make possible the reasonable use of the landd, building or structure: The requested variance is very small (1.45 feet); it is the absolute minimum to meet the required front setback. wel are. The requested variance will have no impact upon surrounding properties or the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION: The applicant's claim of hardship due to the irregular shape of the lot is supportable under the variance decision criteria set furth in Section 20 -5.9. It is recommended that the variance request be approved. 5743 SW 76 Terr. Variance — ,Setback Sep 23, 2010 Attachments: Application Letter oflntent and Justification Letter Location Map Current property survey Property Survey (1987) Land Development Code (LDC) Applicable Regulations Copy of Public Notices TN /SAY X:TBIPB Agendas StaffRepor[s12o10 Agendas StaffRoportsV- 23- t0XPB- ]0.028 5743 SW 76 Terr -Front setback.doc CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI PLANNING BOARD Regular Meeting Meeting Minutes Tuesday, September 23, 2010 City Commission Chambers 7:30 P.M. EXCERPT I. Call to Order and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag Action: The meeting was called to order at 7:37 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison. II. Roll Call Action: Chair Yates requested a roll call. Board members present constituting a quorum: Mrs. Yates, Mrs. Young, Mr. Whitman, Mr. Cruz and Mrs. Beckman. Board members absent: Mr. Farfan and Mr. Morton. City staff present: Thomas J. Vageline (Planning & Zoning Director), Sanford. A. Youkilis (Planning & Zoning Consultant), Marcus Lightfoot (Permit Facilitator) and Lourdes Cabrera - Hernandez (Principal Planner). City Attorney: Mr. Mark Goldstein III. Planning Board Applications/Public Hearings PB -10 -028 Applicant: lliana Villa -Roehr Location: 5743 SW 76 Terrace A Resolution of the Mayor & City Commission of the City of South Miami, Florida, relating to a request for a variance from Section 20- 3.5(G) of the Land Development Code to allow a front setback of 23.55 feet where a minimum of 25 feet is required on property located at 5743 SW 76 Terrace, South Miami, Florida, within the "RS -3 ", Low Density Residential Zoning Use district; the purpose of the variance is to correct an error made when the home was constructed in 1987; providing for an effective date. Action: Ms. Beckman read the item into the record. Planning Board Meeting September 23, 2010 Excerpt Page 2 of 2 Mr. Goldstein informed the Chairman that the application is a quasi-judicial hearing. Mrs. Yates swore in all the citizens who would like to speak on the item. Mr. Youkilis informed the Board that the home on SW 76 Terrace was built in 1987. During that time something happened and staff did not catch that the front set back is 25 feet. As of the moment, from the edge of the garage to the edge of the property is 23.5. The owner is currently trying to sell the property and the bank will not closer the deal since there is one and a half foot difference. The applicant's claim of hardship due to the irregular shape of the lot is supportable under the variance decision criteria set forth in Section 20 -5.9. Staff recommends that the variance request be approved. The Chair opened the public hearing. Speakers: NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE PROJECT Iliana Villa -Roebr 5743 SW 76 Terrace Supports Mrs. Villa -Roehr thanked the Board for taking the time to hear the item.. She commented that she has been the owner since 1997 and the house was purchased directly from the developer. Recently, the house had to be placed up for sale and through a survey ordered by the title company and unpleasant situation has occurred. The problem is creating a hardship seeming that no mortgage lender will accept the property as collateral. NAME ADDRESS SUPPORT /OPPOSE PROJECT Sharon McCain Supports Ms. McCain commented that she supports the variance. She fiuther commented that during this time there were several other properties that have similar situations. The Chair closed the public hearing. Motion: Mr. Cruz moved to approve the application as presented. Mrs. Young seconded. Vote: 5 Ayes 0 Nays Mrs. Yates questioned when the item will be presented to the City Commission. Mr. Youkilis responded October 19, 2010. Ms. Beckman suggested that the applicant provide staff with the signatures of the neighbors so that it is provided to the City Commission. W:\PB1PB Minutesr2010 Minutesl 9- 23- 20101PB. Minutes.9.23.2010.PB.10.028.doc v R 1Q� � C m Y 0 ai O Q CO V G N m m m a o � P to w co SO ko SO W ODD W N LO N s E a Z n O f7l Z N N p d �uiU d 0 T C tl O 6 d xO d N } C O Y } a V C E r 9q Y N c ro c v `ro d w IS E E G a Q a q N O CD y CD 4Yr T� 9 m ♦ wI F�1 'W'u O N 50 a l \V �� • �� R3ianri!-LcrMld.�xannva:.liiicr U-12 " u S Vaw m 9emmixwona�weu� N .aaimv.ap[Imm•mrww+ tiw + =ma�vrvm e.+emn %r. Wmnu,w E.R.—p- m �/a� i W- 1111i. dun�'ulGrc �•Y� aei wnW uesm RM1O W M�M1Dr ° mst�3 a x N Wq�F �M� nr0 Y �4w u wdna5 � x � x Wads Wp Iwl WF IWi ➢MYSmevamYfP[Yr+W[MM. .•', flOWIIA XNH lYan qW amP 1[9[ ILI[ Sf[ (W[ H}MaY la[rtYKa+`a llPlawl MNSbSt bwk5boeouSOUOp&ntpP rceaWrgabap1Y0002m 11OBMn°YS ��f 1[bS mHNw �R�S[Spa.[e m ai lipnbi0¢aMSmall u05toausellu ^ /jp ) 0 (3 0 Idrgarugsfdlltomoo[ e^ IadeNlbmmebiYAY pNnl stendatd mgiilt ae [umclaornsormWM. �wTvo�W ]i �J�� �5'T IYemx�"a T aPq�H Mme. eq.N AA6 .��6•`+Pnn yrv.., nNOCIMOfive Imr I [ ]TS mP � BSggllyeytlAn P[inr,polnmewera (TN aD eWaPoK Sumn "� " "� �S_II,Jm.' N[mnle 915sm. .mom /M1V Wua ng3/M Spn H9Y°WaY pa• P.rgY P.g.W.a.m u.aw.. nmwr�Fl4w uv hHW Nlan Wmam mWr(cd. [11_��maam om xMrapswem5an %nw;a5ioroaa� chW�Nm°NeR M1w[4nn mMh rt•n y +wuW+wv 5 wp mr xr.auzana wNroPUn v9 Awwa0.xW MU' Vwaa' Mm�wrx�ryeuw,oa mb. Sn •v� MarUROb(w 59010 i0081M1ropph P•p. M10 Y4W. tmm .�.a:m DEWAMOPMOR, saoaxz.s4az. WAMHLEAOOM W awYwoekow"fw KIWR A--COK MIMIWItICmc.k Ilkgaiput 9.94D RUGS gEtAtIEOOUF io RAMNABIM S iU6G,WpawwW BrvrrlOwMlilih bwk5boeouSOUOp&ntpP rceaWrgabap1Y0002m IMmalethWW andmiM dv�a dm�whwkwnlaln lipnbi0¢aMSmall u05toausellu IovalSOl bdtl Idrgarugsfdlltomoo[ vb1at491MxMOrallwa IadeNlbmmebiYAY pNnl stendatd ataMarasantlaMtlpnla [umclaornsormWM. ppslrrepnreaaahmnrok bdvebeenrvpwhd. iMSmNrrgS /dllpmwt Trpna9hxkmisvcro ktlenlybelxg SWOWinlNwmoadswN reeNmmmtsbemumlhby nNOCIMOfive miss'uHI1M sapawxawooadrvlNlon TWmmebk'bCPAONy P[inr,polnmewera tMrwlaildsOPOCNwad 'SNFF. "AMIMtmWM +�ertlinvplvComlM COMi15 o11pW 5ppaleto + N a tla0taranMwlored txol�VaoSMVObpdn 'xo0ldnpaws. mWr(cd. iMhoousw«osaaal xMrapswem5an %nw;a5ioroaa� M4 4wOrMIW WlwnaM Vwlolvsloms wlalogimmJen.lhwgn IlonwWelmmC¢c MarUROb(w 59010 i0081M1ropph P•p. M10 Y4W. Ior410 to 410, f-OM0anpaMal Ca1lMCOmptlnYO( 9�1�0'IP01 >6. DEWAMOPMOR, wada.0 $!Ild.01. STODW SRAUD awYwoekow"fw iMSahadYOeelelnlpA Se IhaSmaY fiara Mrlp. Aid OammLYW tachNoNkSwx Mtomo mdYbpmoYJeg sompedlm wzezwnsumClS a55BIhOM w%fi1M GSWnaelwxrow411H5 educallmtNulrpaNtw a^'kOwerow/eNO to nnapogmlrwtammoo( lwlthexoprohxh iiwslms5mvawaw;m arraa5.ommphdtle ehdtgetl honpworkypcan ImprovaYOw<fi1W'S _Wr1Wbe%n9 IMa wM1neWas 9[Mas.11YpVxealutor. pramhotlaMhaHn41M yWMbMbouWn9lwW mo^aYwtlMrarvntlirttlH Iao.Ihalr WM,ttwoMa wmM OtotroShnMtvm Iw Ncome. OvorPOM%15Nm. �IYOVrcplUlotlwkllglw TM1eMlamiDado CwaUmw Pwrv;cai IieMx, ma'noklugsarea Poparlm[nI MS WPteo'wdy to wAVriba IPIOrmelbM011elpYap 1MaIlMCOaunpnrlpWx ASwMi RJeehq lfi�� mlorwemvplwsa . sluaapnazlrlPlM mlemxendspmvwo ro5end. asnsie �tkuymwemalwY ProgrameMeabkloehAl oMlnewllhOPVetYia IMnlhoayeWd.upenfeo bafPdenYwh¢lalnllw k5YW 10mad'. IoalMrdpmAy,