Ord No 29-11-2102ORDINANCE NO. 29 -11 -2102
An Ordinance adopting the
Capital
and Operating
Budget of
$1 °w,- „1659736 $19,159.736
tentative,
and
and pay
plan for
the fiscal year 2011/2012.
of this ordinance.
WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted a proposed budget together with a
budget message and supporting schedule including a pay plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to
Chapter
200,
Florida Statutes, the Mayor and City
Commission are required to adopt a
tentative,
and
thereafter, a final budget for the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE
IT ORDAINED
BY THE
MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH MIAMI,
FLORIDA
THAT:
Section I. The Budget for the fiscal year, as submitted by the City Manager,
including the pay plan, as filed in the City Clerk's Office, in an amount of $19,165,736, -
$19.159736 be and the same is hereby approved. Independently identified as General Fund in
the amount of $1', '044, $16,112,447 Storm Water Drain Trust Fund in an amount of
$318,783 Local Option Gas Trust Fund in an amount of $185,000, Peoples Transportation Tax
Fund in an amount of $707,750, Debt Service in the amount of $637,726, Capital Improvement
Program in the amount of $84- 85, $926,58 2 State Forfeiture Fund in an amount of $12,000.,
and Federal Forfeiture Fund in the amount of $259,448.
Section 2. Any amount encumbered during Fiscal Year 2010-2011, but paid in Fiscal
Year 2011-2012 shall be transferred in accordance with GAAP and reflected in the 2011-2012
budget.
Section 3.
Severability.
If any section, clause,
sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance is for any
reason held invalid
or unconstitutional by a
court of competent jurisdiction,
this holding shall not
affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this ordinance.
Section 4. Ordinances in Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all
section and parts of sections of ordinances in direct conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
However, it is not the intent of this section to repeal entire ordinances, or parts of ordinances,
that give the appearance of being in conflict when the two ordinances can be harmonized or
when only a portion of the ordinance in conflict needs to be repealed to harmonize the
ordinances. If the ordinance in conflict can be harmonized by amending its terms, it is hereby
amended to harmonize the two ordinances. Therefore, only that portion that needs to be
repealed to harmonize the two ordinances shall be repealed.
Section S. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon enactment.
PASSED AND ENACTED this 27” day of September, 2011.
Ord. No. 29 -11 -2102
ATTEST: j
CITY CLERK
I st Reading — 9/13/11
2nd Reading — 9/27/11
COMMISSION VOTE: 5 -0
Mayor Stoddard: Yea
Vice Mayor Newman: Yea
Commissioner Beasley: Yea
Commissioner Harris: Yea
Commissioner Palmer: Yea
WAMy Documents \resolutions \Ordinance Capital Operating Budget and Pay Plan FY 12 amended.doc
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
From: Hector Mirabile, Ph.D., City Manager ;�
Date: September 27, 2011 (''
SUBJECT: 2 "d Budget Hearing - Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Proposed Budget
BACKGROUND* The following is the list of major adjustments incorporated in the Proposed. FY
2011 -2012 Budget after the September 13, 2011, budget workshop, considering
recommendations provided by the Mayor and Commission. Below is a detailed
breakdown as to the changes incorporated in the proposed budget by
department.
AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM & FEDERAL LOBBYIST
The Finance Department reviewed the revenue projections for the After School
Program and determined that the revenues anticipated from the increased fees
for non - residents and the CRA scholarship contributions would provide the
proper dollar amount to maintain revenues at the projected levels. Hence, the
need to eliminate the Federal Lobbyist based on the reduction of fees required to
continue to operate the After School program is unneeded. The City
maintained the originally proposed expenditure line item which includes the
Federal Lobbyist, for your reconsideration under the new set of facts.
CITY MANAGER & CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE
The salary for the Sr. Code Enforcement Officer is being paid for by the CRA:
After further review, the code enforcement budget did not reflect the reduction
of the Code Enforcement Officer salary. Thus, the General Fund — Code
Enforcement Office had an additional $91,397 in personnel costs. The savings
from this discrepancy is being allocated to comply with Commission requests
from the I' Budget Hearing for fuel efficient/Hybrid vehicles. The additional
funds were allocated to the Capital Improvement Fund for the purchase of three
new hybrid Ford Escape vehicles ($86,784) two for the Code Enforcement Office
and one to replace the Ford Expedition assigned to the City Manager. The
purchase is in line with the city's continued effort in the area of sustainable
initiatives. The additional $4,613 is for the stripping, decals and any additional
incidentals related to the purchase of the hybrid vehicles. CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
The City reduced
the
expenditure amount
related to the City's fish pond
immediately next to
City
Hall to $4,000, which
represents a $6,000 reduction.
Below please find the appropriation amount breakdown by fund for the proposed
FY 2012 budget, taking into account the changes incorporated after the 1' budget
hearing.
FY 2012 Appropriation Amount
1st
SUPPORT: Proposed FY 2011 -2012 Budget (September 27, 201 1)
Reading
Revised
Difference
General Fund
16,2031844
16,112,447
- 91,397
Stormwater Drain Trust Fund
318,783
318,783
0
Local Option Gas Tax
185,000
1850000
0
Peoples Transportation
707,750
707,750
0
Debt Service
637,726
637,726
0
Hometown Improvement Fund
0
0
0
Capital Improvement Program
841,185
926,582
85,397
Emergency Reserve
0
0
0
State Forfeiture
12,000
12,000
0
Federal Forfeiture
259,448
259,448
0
TOTAL
19,1651736
19,159,736
-61000
SUPPORT: Proposed FY 2011 -2012 Budget (September 27, 201 1)
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Miamf.Dade County, Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
V. PEREZ, who on oath says that he or she is the
LEGAL CLERK, Legal Notices of the Miami Daily Business
Review f/k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday
and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Mami -Dade
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice in the matter of
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - NOTICE OF SECOND BUDGET
HEARING - (FY 2011/2012)
In the XXXX Court,
was published In said newspaper in the issues of
09116/2011
Afflant further says that the said Miami Daily Business
Review is a newspaper published at Miami In said Miami -Dade
County, Florida and that the said newspaper has
heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County,
Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays)
and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post
office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a
period of one year next preceding the first publication of the
attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or
she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation
any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose
of securing this advertisement for publication in the said
newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
16 day of SEPTEMBER A.D. 2011
(SEAL)
V. PEREZ personally known to me
�•� °�„ Nota ry Public State of Rorida
°x
+ Cheryl H. Marmot
My Commission DD793490
Expires 0711812012
O
2
N
°
N
N
W
i
Vw
w
°
y
o
N
L
=
�
co
a
v_
e
i
Re
r
m
N
a
XWX
i
vM
_
m
°gam
ifs
to
LL
(�
iJ
0
r
�
O�
M
%
z
O
+
i1�11
V/
LL
N
N
M
N°
tl'
SL
N
Fir
a
Q
LL
to
S
..
a
o
c��
`
CL
°�_
uu
a�i
a
j
u�i"
�(®
ass
pg
�m�
°�
Q..
0
°g
5
d
ao�
®Q
8°
m
M
ti
tip
�n
w
M
U
,-
o
ua
LL.
m
j
v�
r-
ca
LL
Q
LLA
aca
LL
°
e
h
co
LLI
�y
xO.
`V
`V
Y.'
W
O
o
b
y
N®
°m^e
o
e
oZ;
°
93
2
�R
4
QC
a�
IL
c
QF-a
®
o
�W
ts
'y�N
°�wVoiSWm3
zg