Ord No 28-11-2101ORDINANCE NO. 28 -1 1 -2101
An Ordinance levying the millage of 4.6662 which represents the 2011 rolled -
back rate and is a 6% decrease from the City's current millage rate of
4.9526, for the fiscal year 2011/2012.
WHEREAS, pursuant to section 200.065, Florida Statutes, tax assessments for all real property
within the jurisdiction of the City of South Miami for the fiscal year 2011/2012 has been made
by the property appraiser for Dade County; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the above -cited statutory provision, the Mayor and City Commission
are required to adopt a tentative and thereafter a final millage rate for the taxing jurisdiction of
the City of South Miami.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, FLORIDA THAT:
Section 1. There shall be and hereby is levied upon real property in the City of South
Miami, Florida, a tax of 4.6662 mills on the dollar for the fiscal year 2011/2012 for the
operational expenses of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011,
and ending September 30, 2012. This results in a 6% reduction from the City's FY 2010 -11
property tax rate.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance is
for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this holding
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 3. Ordinances in Conflict. All ordinances or parts of ordinances and all section
and parts of sections of ordinances in direct conflict herewith are hereby repealed. However, it is
not the intent of this section to repeal entire ordinances, or parts of ordinances, that give the
appearance of being in conflict when the two ordinances can be harmonized or when only a
portion of the ordinance in conflict needs to be repealed to harmonize the ordinances. If the
ordinance in conflict can be harmonized by amending its terms, it is hereby amended to
harmonize the two ordinances. Therefore, only that portion that needs to be repealed to
harmonize the two ordinances shall be repealed.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon enactment.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2 7 th _ day of September, 2011.
ATTEST: APPROVED:
-�—
QPRK MAYOR
Ord. No. 28 -11 -2101
1'i Reading 9 3/11
2 "a Reading - / 2 7/ 11
LEGALITY: COMMISSION VOTE: 5 -0
'1 Mayor Stoddard: Yea
Vice Mayor Newman: Yea
Commissioner Beasley: Yea
Commissioner Harris: Yea
Commissioner Palmer: Yea
South Miami
diFAm&iCa lY
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI 11111F
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER "
INTER- OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2001
To: The Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Commission
From: Hector Mirabile, Ph.D., City Manager
Date: September 27, 2011
SUBJECT: 2 "d Budget Hearing - Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 Proposed Budget
BACKGROUND: The following is the list of major adjustments incorporated in the Proposed. FY
2011 -2012 Budget after the September 13, 2011, budget workshop, considering
recommendations provided by the Mayor and Commission. Below is a detailed
breakdown as to the changes incorporated in the proposed budget by
department.
AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM & FEDERAL LOBBYIST
The Finance Department reviewed the revenue projections for the After School
Program and determined that the revenues anticipated from the increased fees
for non- residents and the CRA scholarship contributions would provide the
proper dollar amount to maintain revenues at the projected levels. Hence, the
need to eliminate the Federal Lobbyist based on the reduction of fees required to
continue to operate the After School program is unneeded. The City
maintained the originally proposed expenditure line item which includes the
Federal Lobbyist, for your reconsideration under the new set of facts.
CITY MANAGER & CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE
The salary for the Sr. Code Enforcement Officer is being paid for by the CRA:
After further review, the code enforcement budget did not reflect the reduction
of the Code Enforcement Officer salary. Thus, the General Fund — Code
Enforcement Office had an additional $91,397 in personnel costs. The savings
from this discrepancy is being allocated to comply with Commission requests
from the I' Budget Hearing for fuel efficient/Hybrid vehicles. The additional
funds were allocated to the Capital Improvement Fund for the purchase of three
new hybrid Ford Escape vehicles ($86,784) two for the Code Enforcement Office
and one to replace the Ford Expedition assigned to the City Manager. The
purchase is in line with the city's continued effort in the area of sustainable
initiatives. The additional $4,613 is for the stripping, decals and any additional
incidentals related to the purchase of the hybrid vehicles. CAPITAL
IMPROVEM15NT FUND
The City reduced
the
expenditure amount
related to
the City's fish pond
immediately next to
City
Hail to $4,000, which
represents a
$6,000 reduction.
Below please find the appropriation amount breakdown by fund for the proposed
FY 2012 budget, taking into account the changes incorporated after the I' budget
hearing.
FY 2012 Appropriation Amount
1st
SUPPORT: Proposed FY 2011 -2012 Budget (September 27, 201 1)
Reading
Revised
Difference
General Fund
16,203,844
16,112,447
- 910397
Stormwater Drain Trust Fund
318,783
318,783
0
Local Option Gas Tax
185,000
185,000
0
Peoples Transportation
707,750
707,750
0
Debt Service
637,726
637,726
0
Hometown Improvement Fund
0
0
0
Capital Improvement Program
841,185
926,582
85,397
Emergency Reserve
0
0
0
State Forfeiture
12,000
12,000
0
Federal Forfeiture
259,448
259,448
0'
TOTAL
19,165,736
19,159,736
-61000
SUPPORT: Proposed FY 2011 -2012 Budget (September 27, 201 1)
MIAMI DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW
Published Daily except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miamr, MrambDade County, Florida
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI -DADE:
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared
V. PEREZ, who on oath says that he or she is the
LEGAL CLERK, Legal Notices of the Mlami Dally Business
Review f /k/a Miami Review, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday
and Legal Holidays) newspaper, published at Miami in Miami -Dade
County, Florida; that the attached copy of advertisement,
being a Legal Advertisement of Notice In the matter of
CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI - NOTICE OF SECOND BUDGET
HEARING - (FY 2011 /2012)
in the XXXX Court,
was published in said newspaper in the issues of
09/16/2011
AHfant further says that the said Miami Daily Business
Review is a newspaper published at Miami in said Miami -Dade
County, Florida and that the said newspaper has
heretofore been continuously published in said Miami -Dade County,
Florida, each day (except Saturday, Sunday and Legal Holidays)
and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post
office in Miami in said Miami -Dade County, Florida, for a
period of one year next preceding the first publication of the
attached copy of advertisement; and afflant further says that he or
she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation
any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose
of securing this advertisement for publication in the said
newspaper.
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
16 day of SEPTEMBER , A.D. 2011
(SEAL) %
V. PEREZ personally known to me
0' ^l er Notary Public State of Rorida
Cheryl H. Mariner
My Cormnission DD793490
Expires 07/t8OV
h
°
o
IM1
O
cp
O
6
N
q
N
N
N
NN
�
m
4
N
µ
wtn
pC
m
LL
o
m
Q
Y
~
o
Q
O
Z
r
Q
m
°go
,,,p
cV.CC
°
.0
LL
CL
mq
N
�=
aa��
Q
QNZ
W
m
W
JV1
aG
Q
W
r
0
O
d
a
z�
5
in
®_
z
1lf�SN
i%i
Wso
F
m
m
m
�9
~
6
m
m
m
T
Cn
WMh
vi
UJ
LL
�
U
U)
[
U
W
rj
LL
Q
o
'tl
d
..
0.0
o_
$
D
CL
ra
4/
<
c�
to
W
LL
cu
cd
w
E
LU
0
Q
1rY
v+
CI
ti
Tmn
N
C/
M^
O
m°
a
M1
m
Q
m
r
P
P
^am
Q
=d
o
CSi
�•
V
!(
a
F"
CL
i90
CL
16
i
cu
m
A7
a
h
W
IC
_
U
U
•wig
U
�
V
�
22
6
�
o
is
+�
g
HUM
L=ni
`SS
29=